Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2009, 04:07 AM   #1
Kyle Marston
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Default Scaling/Relative Intensity 2

I really liked Pierre's article and am going to give his scaling methodology a shot but I struggled a bit with the methodology for scaling gymanstics movements. If you've read the article, where did the 50% scaling for the total pullups in the Fran example come from?

I doesn't really make sense to me to scale the bodyweight stuff based on the weightlifting scaling of 50%, nor does it make sense to scale just on the rep range of 45 (suggesting scaling of 40%-50%). Mainly because that means that the scaling would never change even as you got better at pullups. It does make sense to keep the reps in any given round below the max pullup number, but the scaling of 50% seems to be more precise than that. I'm sure I'm just missing something obvious here.
Kyle Marston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2009, 09:49 AM   #2
Steven Low
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
Default

I'd scale them according to your max reps of pullups.

The other way you can do it is scale according to your weighted 1 RM, but then you could be potentially adding in weighted pullups for Fran if you got strong enough.
__________________
Posts NOT intended as professional medical, training or nutrition advice.
Site // Bodyweight Strength Training Article // Overcoming Gravity Bodyweight Book
Steven Low is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.