Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2009, 03:45 AM   #1
Grissim Connery
Senior Member
 
Grissim Connery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default Interesting take on strength

My friend recently worked out with the barbarians in boston.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i00UsztVJQ0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbxEd...eature=related

he told me an interensting take that some of them had on strength. one of their goals was just to stay on a bar for as long as possible. this reminded me of ring work, but in a way i hadn't thought of. recently i'd been thinkin how a lot of sprint like sports do much more aerobic/alactic work than i would have thought. for example, i've had tons of swimmer friends who, like most of you probably know, swim for insane numbers of hours when their event is sometimes very short.

i've often taken the stance that to get better at handstands, one needs to spend as much gross time as possible in the handstand. obviously though as one gets bored and starts cranking out mad handstand pushups, fatigue sets in fast. it would seem more organic at that point to, instead of gritting it out in the handstand, drop down and just remain on the hands in any other comfortable fashion, whether it be an L sit or, for more comfort, an elbow lever (or for less comfort, a planche hah).

thus it would seem that for uppper body flows, one would spend as much time as possible in both hangs and supports. i then wondered how to apply this to lower body mechanics, and it seemed that the simplest mentality would be to stay in the air as much as possible (probably from a parkour/free running perspective).

i think i'm gonna play with this for a bit now, just trying to spend as much time during workouts in all three of these states.
Grissim Connery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2009, 05:51 AM   #2
George Mounce
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 945
Default

Really interesting, I'll be looking forward to what you have to report!
George Mounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2009, 01:28 PM   #3
Derek Weaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642
Default

As I'm understanding it, it's basically time under tension, right?

It makes sense, and I'm certainly interested to see how things translate with the lower body aspect.
__________________
Quote:
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
- CJ Kim
Derek Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2009, 03:31 PM   #4
Grissim Connery
Senior Member
 
Grissim Connery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

because in the past i've done workouts where the gross amount of time spent in a handstand must be x number of minutes (generally 10-20 with however much rest in between), i figured a first draft version of this type of work would be to set x number of minutes in both the hang and supports. i don't think i could apply this same method to being in the air though. anybody got any ideas on how to measure this?
Grissim Connery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2009, 05:12 PM   #5
Grissim Connery
Senior Member
 
Grissim Connery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
Default

notes:

1. i can do much more support work than hang simply due to grip strength requirements
2. when doing hang work, do pullups before rows, inverted pulls, and german/skin the cat/back pulls. i find that latter groups deplete grip strength faster, especially the inverted pulls. i'm not as sure what to start with in terms of supports yet, but i think handstands are best to start off first. by doing them against a wall and facing it, you can easily perform cast wall walks and change angles easily. i kept paralletes nearby to do L and straddle holds.
3. a third timed interval can be straight-body work. i generally found that boat type v-up and candlestick/dragon flag movements were beneficial as well as headstands while maneuvering legs in all kinds of ranges
4. i added the straight body work after finding that only doing tuck work dramatically increased time in support and hang. i figured it'd be best to start off novice and keep it all tuck before progressing.
5. i tried to keep the time alotments even. next time i'm probably gonna do a 3/5/7 ratio of hang/support/straight body time alotments (probably just doubled to a 6/10/14 minute amount of work).
6. around-the-world-pullups work well for this type of endeavor. i applied it to supports as well
Grissim Connery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 01:51 PM   #6
Steven Low
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
Default

I was meaning to answer this the past time around, but I never did..

Anyway, the concept works much better for skill movements such as handstands etc. (aka practice makes perfect) BUT it must be quality practice.

On the other hand, you do get a grease the groove-like effect of just being on and doing something much more, but for most work you're going to have the problem of this is transferring more into endurance after a while than strength.

I do think it's valuable to just get tons of time on the bar every now and again, but it's not going to be of that great value. Obviously, getting into rings support a lot is critical to building up proficiency in the frictionless plane though so that will help out with everything on rings somewhat.

On the other hand, consider how much time monkeys spend on the trees with their arms. You will eventually adapt to being on the bar with a much stronger shoulder girdle. Is it worth it though tearing up your hands and potentially overusing a lot of your upper body? I dunno. It can be done though, but progression needs to take place over a while.
__________________
Posts NOT intended as professional medical, training or nutrition advice.
Site // Bodyweight Strength Training Article // Overcoming Gravity Bodyweight Book
Steven Low is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 05:43 AM   #7
Blair Lowe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 593
Default

there is something to be said about doing mini ring strength routines such as the ones found on drillsandskills.com or gymnasticbodies.com

i think they usually took about 1 minute to perform in total. that's a long damn minute! if you manage to stay on the rings the entire time that's a lot of TUT even in the rest positions like support, L, HS, and basket
Blair Lowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator