Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Endurance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2006, 09:45 AM   #1
Dan Snyder
New Member
 
Dan Snyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2
Default Differences of endurance training vs anaerobic training for endurance

This may be obvious but I'm curious to hear about what folks think about the unique effects of endurance training for endurance. It seems to me that the training effect of a several-hour effort trains one to endure a several-hour effort in ways that high intensity training can't. Of course there are numerous detriments to endurance specific training but are there any case studies where a sprinter for instance, ran an endurance race and performed similar to an endurance trained athlete? What are the detriments, if any, high intensity/interval training has for endurance trained athletes especially if endurance trained athletes were to train for an extended period anaerobically?
Dan Snyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 10:26 AM   #2
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,702
Default

I think the key here is defining the duration in question. Brief, high-intensity interval type training will produce adequate results to a point. But once you start getting into longer events, specific LSD training is a must. I don't think that extended training is necessary to actually develop endurance in the sense of cardiopulmonary capacity, but more to condition body structures to endure that kind of extended, repetitive abuse, develop movement technique and economy, and to prepare the athlete mentally.

Another component is simply body comp as well--to be a successful endurance athlete, you simply cannot be large and muscular. Long term endurance training will eventually cause atrophy of type II muscle and even type I eventually to create a body of minimal mass and great capillary density. If muscularity is maintained through high intensity training, this is obviously counterproductive to high-end endurance athletics.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 12:43 PM   #3
Robb Wolf
Senior Member
 
Robb Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,444
Default

Dan-
The Power running site has a nice perspective on this:
http://www.powerrunning.com/

Basicly sprint work, strength work and then trying to run your even AT race pace. Specificity is covered with the race pace efforts while power and foot turn over are improved with power and sprint work. I think this combo is where it's at for elite performance unless the event is very long in which case you want something like what Greg described, in which every non-essential scrap of tissue has been catabolized. Not a rosy picture but that may be what’s necessary for some events/activities.

I know Mark Twight commented that his long efforts (48-72hr climbs) improved Dramatically with the inclusion of CrossFit but he still needed the long efforts, almost more for mental toughness than physical performance.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin

Robb's Blog
Robb Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 01:35 PM   #4
Steve Shafley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,285
Default

I remember Mark Twight talking about the physical rigors of being moving that long as something that needed to be considered:

-blister formation
-raw spots from clothing
-adequate hydration during the effort

Stuff like that.
Steve Shafley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 10:03 AM   #5
Jeremy Jones
Senior Member
 
Jeremy Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 181
Default

As Shaf said, developing the propper 'wear' areas is also important. Some things are just not going to become tough enough without doing the extended efforts at least occationally.


Does anyone have some documentation on these super long distance runners (multi marathoner types) that have a lot of lean mass (compaired to their starving waif counterparts)?
__________________
-Jeremy Jones
www.diablocrossfit.com
Jeremy Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 02:37 PM   #6
Chris Forbis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 836
Default

I have no documentation, but I'm sure you could find some stuff about Dean Karnazes with Google. He's pretty damn jacked for an ultra-marathoner.
Chris Forbis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 03:23 PM   #7
Scott Kustes
Senior Member
 
Scott Kustes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Forbis View Post
I have no documentation, but I'm sure you could find some stuff about Dean Karnazes with Google. He's pretty damn jacked for an ultra-marathoner.
http://www.ultramarathonman.com/flash/
__________________
Scott

Fitness Spotlight
Scott Kustes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2006, 02:20 PM   #8
Motion MacIvor
New Member
 
Motion MacIvor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 25
Default

IMHO the thing that makes lsd training so effective for long distance events is the eficiency it gives your movement. I forget where I saw it but there is a chart out there somewhere that shows power, cardio capacity, and eficiency. over several years power and cardio capacity will top out. Eficiency does not top out it continues to increase year after year (even if only by a single % or two). Yes intervals are important for building power and cardio capacity but once you top out the only way to become faster is to become more eficient so that you can put out higher power levels with less exertion. Cycling coaches have found that The training required for a road race (2-5 hrs) is also effective for events as short as 5 minutes. Racers who specialize in track and do not spend hours on the road doing LSD do not generaly have an advantage as soon as the event goes past five minutes.
Motion MacIvor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2006, 09:45 AM   #9
Robb Wolf
Senior Member
 
Robb Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,444
Default

Motion-

I think that is the Seiler piece on the 2 waves of training adaptations. What he came to was intervals worked very well but at the elite levels efficiency was king. Intervals and power work obviously have their place but if one aspires to be elite in endurance efforts...you will have to log some efficiency hours. Even in this case if one uses intervals as a base and focuses the long efforts on establishing race pace and efficiency of movement, I think you have a powerful formula there. Straight from the power running site.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin

Robb's Blog
Robb Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 03:04 PM   #10
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

The need for long steady distance training to reinforce mechanics seems much more pronounced in technical endurance disciplines like X country skiing, swimming and speed skating where efficiency utterly rules.

In cycling it is wildly variable depending on the discipline and goal. For track events, I have not seen long steady distances be at all effective at improving mechanics or "endurance" for track specifically.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Motion MacIvor View Post
IMHO the thing that makes lsd training so effective for long distance events is the eficiency it gives your movement. I forget where I saw it but there is a chart out there somewhere that shows power, cardio capacity, and eficiency. over several years power and cardio capacity will top out. Eficiency does not top out it continues to increase year after year (even if only by a single % or two). Yes intervals are important for building power and cardio capacity but once you top out the only way to become faster is to become more eficient so that you can put out higher power levels with less exertion. Cycling coaches have found that The training required for a road race (2-5 hrs) is also effective for events as short as 5 minutes. Racers who specialize in track and do not spend hours on the road doing LSD do not generaly have an advantage as soon as the event goes past five minutes.
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator