Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Olympic Weightlifting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2007, 11:51 AM   #1
Elliot Royce
Senior Member
 
Elliot Royce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 317
Default Increasing strength vs. increasing size

I thought this might be interesting. I asked my coach why my thighs had not increased in size since March even though my leg strength had increased so much.

Here's his response:

Well first it proves that you have a lot of untapped potential! You've only just started working your legs, fully, in the last month or two.
Its interesting, but at first espescially it is known that most of the increase in stregnth output comes from neurolugical factors, not just increased cross section-
-synchrony and coordination of exact muscles used espescially in a multi joiunt movement,

-disinhibition of the antagonist (opposing muscle group) ie unnecessary muscles get out of the way

- disinhibition of protective factors like Golgi Tendon Organs that normally protect the muscle from generating too much force at once and doing harm.
Whe nthey "learn" to let more motor units fire, more force output results with not yet a big change in size. This is why we train with low reps and big weight, with lots of sets. Many ways of teaching the body to generate big force, something it naturally doesn't due for safety reasons.

- also this typ[e of hypertrophy, called myofibrillar hypertrophy, is known not to be as quick or drastic as the "pump" kind, called sarcoplasmic hypertrophy. In myofibrillar, the contractile elemnets, actin and myosin, thicken and increase in number., in sarcoplasmic, the noncontractile elements, mostly fluid (sarcoplasm) increases. This is why the bodybuilder who is very large, does not walk onto the oOlympic platform and cj 700 pounds, even tho he "looks it" - to those who don't know what theyre looking
at:-) and by the same token, the Oler is not going to don a pair of posing trunks and win the Olympiia. Interesting stuff, vital to knowing how to train for the results you want.
Elliot Royce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 12:54 PM   #2
Yuen Sohn
Senior Member
 
Yuen Sohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 957
Default

Yeah, it's pretty amazing to see some of the weights thrown around by people who aren't necessarily built like a brick sh-thouse.

Here's a 77kg class lifter from NJ, Mike Tirrito, snatching 130kg...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HjYgfOAzeNM
...and he only outweighs me by a few pounds!

There's another local lifter, Peter Musa, whom I recently saw snatching 100 and CJ'ing 123 at a bodyweight of under 69kgs (he's around 14 or 15 years old, btw).

http://www.womag1.com/Photos/display...d&cat=0&pos=15

To see this in-person is both inspiring and depressing at the same time...
Yuen Sohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 03:16 PM   #3
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,732
Default

usually with classic weightlifting (sans anabolic agents), you don't get hugely muscular bodies--training in that 1-3 rep range is nearly all neurological development. the lifters you see who are huge are a) genetically pre-disposed to be muscular; b) tend to do more building work such as 5s and 6s (there are some lifters at the OTC who sometimes do 10s in the squat--why, I couldn't tell you); and/or c) on drugs. plus these guys early in their careers move into their final weight classes and then must continue making strength gains without getting any heavier.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 05:56 PM   #4
Elliot Royce
Senior Member
 
Elliot Royce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 317
Default

Yoon - I know what you mean but somehow being 45 years old with 2 artificial hips allows me to rationalize (although I know I wouldn't have been doing that at 14 years old).

Greg - I remember something in Kono's book about knowing who the bad O lifters were: they had the overdeveloped biceps and triceps. Doing it inefficiently produces more muscle mass.
Elliot Royce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 06:42 PM   #5
Derek Simonds
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoon Sohn View Post
Yeah, it's pretty amazing to see some of the weights thrown around by people who aren't necessarily built like a brick sh-thouse.

Here's a 77kg class lifter from NJ, Mike Tirrito, snatching 130kg...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HjYgfOAzeNM
...and he only outweighs me by a few pounds!

To see this in-person is both inspiring and depressing at the same Time...
Uh I out weigh him by at least 10 Kg's and I am excited about doing 1/2 plus bw snatches let alone almost 2 times bw. Wow! I have figured out anytime I need motivation it is only as far away as YouTube. Amazing some of the lifts on there.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin

http://westvolusiawellness.com/
Derek Simonds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 10:34 AM   #6
John Alston
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tidy bowl man's apt.
Posts: 1,121
Default

It's funny how rare to see anyone do as few reps as 5 or 6, let alone singles, doubles or triples in a regular gym. Don't they ever want to test themselves for a max, just to see?
Though a lot of serious bb will mix in occasional max effort work because it helps to develop muscle quality and can lead to better size gains later, but the mooks who do endless sets always get the puffy muscle and don't show their countless hours of "work" in the gym.
__________________
"Morning, Putski eats it, noon, Putski eats it, night, Putski eats it. Putski loves!"
John Alston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 06:59 AM   #7
John Alston
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tidy bowl man's apt.
Posts: 1,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Everett View Post
usually with classic weightlifting (sans anabolic agents), you don't get hugely muscular bodies--training in that 1-3 rep range is nearly all neurological development. the lifters you see who are huge are a) genetically pre-disposed to be muscular; b) tend to do more building work such as 5s and 6s (there are some lifters at the OTC who sometimes do 10s in the squat--why, I couldn't tell you); and/or c) on drugs. plus these guys early in their careers move into their final weight classes and then must continue making strength gains without getting any heavier.
So Greg, would you put 5s in a more building than strengthening rep range? I thought 5s were a good median between the two extremes. That is, you might build more size with 5s than with 2s, but you'd be building muscle of still a high quality, unlike, say, in sets of 8 or 12.
__________________
"Morning, Putski eats it, noon, Putski eats it, night, Putski eats it. Putski loves!"
John Alston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 09:06 AM   #8
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,732
Default

5/6s will build some size, and definitely more quality size than 8-12s (they are a good balance, hence their popularity). But it's rare to find an advanced lifter who does higher than 5s. So in the weightlifting arena, I would consider 5/6s size building because if the goal is strictly strength, lower reps will work better
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 09:38 AM   #9
Allen Yeh
Senior Member
 
Allen Yeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,245
Default

I recall Christian Thibadeau over at T-nation defines reps between 4-6 as functional hypertrophy.
__________________
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
Allen Yeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2007, 10:24 AM   #10
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen Yeh View Post
I recall Christian Thibadeau over at T-nation defines reps between 4-6 as functional hypertrophy.
Yeah but doesnt he also promote volume during the week....aka one day of 4-6 and another or 12-15 reps? Variety is good....
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator