Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Nutrition > General Nutrition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2007, 02:57 AM   #1
Yvana van den Hork
Member
 
Yvana van den Hork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NL, Europe
Posts: 34
Default Is it about zero food or about low food intake?

Now I'm confused. I've been reading too much on IF by now and everything gets a bit fuzzy because of the various interpretations. What is the most vital characteristic about IF?

Is it about eating zero food during xx hours, say 12-24 hrs and giving your gut a complete rest?
Or is it about eating very little one day and then eating lots another day , viz. an extreme zigzag pattern.


In the first case we are talking about an absolute fast and then a feast, that might take you at or over maintenance every single day.
In the second case someone can theoretically eat 6 teeny-tiny meals of say 100-150 kcals each one day and then semi-gorge another day.
And, in the second case, does it HAVE to be a ketodiet , since ketodiets are said to give much of the same effects as fasting does, because of the low carb intake.

I've seen a lot of people experimenting with IF and have seen many interpretations passing by. So, please give your interpretation!
__________________
Contrarian and anti-KISS!
diet: back to 3 square meals but skipping lunch = 2 short fasts.
Yvana van den Hork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 06:52 AM   #2
Allen Yeh
Senior Member
 
Allen Yeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,245
Default

I always tended to think it was more of option 1. I know it'd be very difficult to go over maintenance calories if my eating window is only 6-9 hours, I sometimes have a tough time getting all ~3000 in that time to begin with that I don't even worry about going over. I typically do my fasts in 15-18 hour stints.

I've found that the longer I have been IF'ing the less total calories I need to maintain.
__________________
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
Allen Yeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 07:22 AM   #3
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

a true fast is only water...no food...otherwise you are still having some sort of insulin response. I am sure both approaches have benefit over the normal daily eating habbits of people today....but the pure fast probably has the most benefit giving the digestive system complete rest. Some people do 15 hours...some do 24hours....some do low carb, some use pwo carbs.....like Alan said you probably will end up needing less calories per day to maintain because of the fasting part saving muscles and enhancing protein/carb sensitivity with periods of zero intake...which allows you to better utilize and asimiliate what you eat....Not sure there is only one right or wrong answer....as every approach gives benefit and everyone has an individualistic base of health (insulin resistance, etc...).
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 10:57 AM   #4
Troy Archie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 515
Default

Isn't the second one essentially CRAN?
__________________
Healthy body sick mind...
Troy Archie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 12:37 PM   #5
Yvana van den Hork
Member
 
Yvana van den Hork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NL, Europe
Posts: 34
Default

CRAN = ?

Sounds like calorie restriction + ??
__________________
Contrarian and anti-KISS!
diet: back to 3 square meals but skipping lunch = 2 short fasts.
Yvana van den Hork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 12:44 PM   #6
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

Calorie Restriction w/ Adaquate Nutrition

For your extreme zig zag of fasting every other day not to be CR you would have to eat for example 4000 cal on the eating day if your normal baseline is 2000 cal/day....although with fasting and more efficient digestion/metabolism...you could probably get by on less calories than you think.....Intermittent Fasting is not CRAN in my book....but everyone has their own interpretation
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2007, 01:48 PM   #7
Troy Archie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 515
Default

Oops, I misread that...
__________________
Healthy body sick mind...
Troy Archie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.