
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
07-24-2007, 06:08 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 346
|
put down the diet soda
nothing new to you all:
http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/repr...A.107.689935v1
higher association of metabolic syndrome with soft drink consumption, regardless of regular vs. diet: "both regular and diet soft drinks
appeared to pose similar metabolic hazards"
but of course, there is this:
http://www.acsh.org/factsfears/newsI...ews_detail.asp
"For example, although the study authors expected a stronger association between risk of MS and higher consumption of regular soda than for diet soda, they didn't find one. Consumption of diet sodas was associated at least as strongly with MS symptoms as was that of regular sodas. Such results are not biologically plausible, and substantially weaken the argument that any of these beverages are really linked to MS, or are intrinsically not healthful."
|
|
|
07-24-2007, 06:25 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,244
|
Man I really need to work on cutting the diet soda out...d'oh!
__________________
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
|
|
|
07-24-2007, 07:19 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,600
|
artificial sweetners have been tied to MS symptoms for a long time....
|
|
|
07-24-2007, 08:33 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,232
|
I saw that this morning and had the same thoughts as Allen.
I have been trying to moderate my diet soda's to 1 / 2 a day. I guess I really need to focus on this.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin
http://westvolusiawellness.com/
|
|
|
07-24-2007, 05:16 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,445
|
Ruth Kava wrote the response to that study...and is apparently a retard:
http://www.acsh.org/about/staffID.10/staff_detail.asp
Results are not biologically plausible? I guess no one has let her in on that fact that AS release insulin...especially those at risk for metabolic syndrome.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin
Robb's Blog
|
|
|
07-25-2007, 06:35 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 131
|
Dr. Kevin Morgan told me this in about 1985. He was the one who gave me Phil Maffetone's book and that is what got me thinking in a different direction.
One upside of this study: it freaked my daughters.
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 06:47 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tidy bowl man's apt.
Posts: 1,121
|
From what I read it wasn't clearly demonstrated that diet soda consumption was not an indicator of other lifestyle issues. There were some controls made to the study, but I don't think it has been clearly demonstrated that it's the soda, and not other thing(s) in common among the soda drinkers.
__________________
"Morning, Putski eats it, noon, Putski eats it, night, Putski eats it. Putski loves!"
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 10:18 AM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,445
|
John-
I only read it once but i thought they DID control for con-founders including smoking, sat fat and exercise?
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin
Robb's Blog
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 11:15 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tidy bowl man's apt.
Posts: 1,121
|
Rob
Sorry if I was unclear, my impression was that some factors were controlled for but that not all were. Of course the nature of the study makes controlling all factors pretty hard.
Maybe I was a little off in what I was reading; I have seen different takes on the study and (yep!) didn't read the source fully myself.
Or maybe I'm just oriented towards being skeptical to simple study solutions sometimes.
Edit: here's what I saw:
Quote:
|
The researchers say the association between soda consumption and metabolic syndrome remained significant after they "adjusted for saturated fat and trans fat intake, dietary fiber consumption, smoking, and physical activity." But they concede "it is conceivable...that there may be residual confounding caused by lifestyle factors not adjusted for in the present analyses."
|
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/121606.html
__________________
"Morning, Putski eats it, noon, Putski eats it, night, Putski eats it. Putski loves!"
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 AM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|

|