Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Olympic Weightlifting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2007, 09:28 AM   #1
Leo Soubbotine
Senior Member
 
Leo Soubbotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 779
Default Squat jerk vs Split jerk

Was curious if there's any benefit in a long run of learning and practicing the squat jerk instead of a split jerk?
Leo Soubbotine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 12:03 PM   #2
Leo Soubbotine
Senior Member
 
Leo Soubbotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 779
Default

Here's what I ended up with today: 72.5 kg clean & squat jerk
http://youtube.com/watch?v=477vdEbA1MM

PR C&J is 105kg, Cln 112.5 kg.
Leo Soubbotine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 12:44 PM   #3
josh everett
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Moreno Valley
Posts: 87
Default

Advantage of sqt jerk: you do not need to lift the bar as high as you would for a split

disadvantage: much much smaller room for error at heavy wts...the lift must be perfect. also it requires a high level of shoulder flexibility.

world records have been set using both styles
josh everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 01:18 PM   #4
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,738
Default

What Josh said - WAY less ability to correct for an unstable bar. In a split, you're able to move your feet quickly in any direction. In a squat, you're essentially stuck in the position you've established as your base. Duck walking is possible, but very slow and risky for the knees.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 01:56 PM   #5
Leo Soubbotine
Senior Member
 
Leo Soubbotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 779
Default

I'll train both for a while and choose whichever one I'll like better.

Thank you.
Leo Soubbotine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 02:46 PM   #6
Derek Simonds
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,231
Default

That was a super deep squat jerk. With the amounts you are OHS'ing looks like you got plenty of upward room on that movement.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin

http://westvolusiawellness.com/
Derek Simonds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 02:58 PM   #7
Leo Soubbotine
Senior Member
 
Leo Soubbotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 779
Default

Yeah. My legs were toast from yesterday clean PR (247) though plus a Sh.Press-Push press-push jerk workout a bit earlier.

Monday is time to start CA wod - right when the Bulg cycle begins.
I'm ready for a break from CF - time to turn the 4 banger engine of mine into a V-6
Leo Soubbotine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 08:37 AM   #8
-Ross Hunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 166
Default

Do any tall lifters successfully squat jerk?

I tried it once (I'm 6'), and I concluded that it would never be possible for me to catch the bar low enough to get a benefit out of it. I'm not sure how tall you are, but in your video you catch the bar at about a quarter squat--basically push-jerk or split-jerk depth. Great squat jerkers seem to catch at about parallel:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=cxy3CVruT1k

I'm not knocking your experiment; some really successful lifters at the national and international level have preferred the push jerk to the split jerk (Dimas and, with an even weirder twist, Kendrick Ferris), so it's not like the split jerk is the only way to go.
-Ross Hunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 02:42 PM   #9
Derek Simonds
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,231
Default

Leo is 6' 3".
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin

http://westvolusiawellness.com/
Derek Simonds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 03:50 PM   #10
Leo Soubbotine
Senior Member
 
Leo Soubbotine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 779
Default

Derek - CF in the Park Dec 8th.

Looks like we're leaving for North Carolina for CF cert on Dec 1-2. Super excited!

And I really want to get that Back hand spring next monday!
Leo Soubbotine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator