
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
|
06-30-2011, 06:29 AM
|
#951
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,232
|
I have so much respect for the approach you take towards your diet. I just don't get that detailed and the results are obvious I am not where I need to be.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin
http://westvolusiawellness.com/
|
|
|
06-30-2011, 07:12 AM
|
#952
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Leangains is a great and flexible template.
I've had so much dietary self-delusion that I need to go a little OCD. Caliper measurement to get real about where my bodycomp is, judicious estimation of daily intake, and a single constant lunch (yogurt + protein powder + berries) allows me to stick to the diet, maintain a normal dinner with the family, and keep on track.
I actually need to get this better dialed in; I would think 1700 calories on rest days and 2600 on WO days would get me where I need to go; with an every 3 day schedule, that works out to 1#/week fat loss but I'm dealing with ravenous appetite on rest days and no appetite on WO days 
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 05:35 PM
|
#953
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Friday:
sn: hit 130#, yay!
cl&j: Blearch
fs: 175#x(1,2,3)x3 - yay!
chin: bwx(1,2,3)x3 - also yay!
BF% increased a tad? boo.
Three yays out of five ain't bad.
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 06:37 PM
|
#954
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642
|
Good job on the work out.
BF% = body dysmorphia? Or just water? I would think that a guy your size would never want to go below 1700 calories. that's less than 10 cals/lb of bodyweight. You'll get there, and I would bet you're closer than you think.
Keep fighting the good fight.
__________________
Quote:
|
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
|
- CJ Kim
|
|
|
07-01-2011, 07:43 PM
|
#955
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Caliper measurement, so no foolin', but water could do it, I guess.
Yes, I figure 2000 off, 2700 on is more sustainable, but that's a slow rate of fat loss.
|
|
|
07-03-2011, 04:37 PM
|
#956
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Sunday:
mini workout:
sn: up to 125#, tried x3 at 130#
cl: up to 175#
|
|
|
07-04-2011, 03:45 PM
|
#957
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Monday:
Happy 4th.
sn: up to 125, tried 2x at 130#
j: up to 155# (quite a gap)
bs: 205#x(1,2,3,1,1)
press: 95#x(1,2,3)x3
wussed on sled pushes due to recovery, did one armed farmer's walks to grip failure x 2 attempts each arm.
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 03:29 PM
|
#958
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Putting fat loss on hold for a month or so, and going to daily lifting. Why? Goal #1 was stalling so might as well trade it for goal #2. Back to lose that last 5# in a month.
sn: up to 130#. OK, ugly pressout. But better than the miss yesterday.
c&l: still nothing, despite many attempts
fs: up to 205#, failed at 215#. Far cry from when I weighed 25# more.
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 09:08 AM
|
#959
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Deep thoughts:
1) I do better on high frequency, high intensity, low volume work
2) I continually forget and re-learn that lesson
3) Muscle mass matters
4) I gain fat easily and lose muscle quickly
5) Leangains worked great to get down 20# without strength loss. The next 5# was a killer, though.
6) The jerk is the lift that's the most sensitive to muscle loss for me; clean recovery (and FS/BS) second-most
I've simplified my goal: Total the most possible as an 85kg lifter.
That implies a few things:
a) The leaner I can get to at 85kg, the more muscle mass I have
b) Getting lean is only good insofar as I use the leanness to gain muscle faster.
c) Higher total implies my snatch and jerk need to be higher
I have 4 variables I need to be tracking:
1) Caliper measurement (either abdominal or mid-thigh, either will do)
2) BW
3) Average daily max snatch
4) Average max rack jerk
Nothing else matters.
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 12:50 PM
|
#960
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Today:
sn: up to 125#, bad top position for 130# twice. Hit 125 for a double, though....
c&j: hit 145#, jerk bad at 155#
bs: up to 245# for a hard single.
See deep thoughts above for interpretation.
Metrics:
184#, 32mm combined ab + thigh, 12% computed bf (by mirror a bit higher)
Average sn: 127.5#, average j: 150#.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 AM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|

|