Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Nutrition > General Nutrition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2008, 07:53 AM   #1
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default Free market economics at t-nation

Today t-nation posted an article about grass-fed beef, and during the intro, the author had this to say:

Quote:
In an actual free market economy, only an idiot would grow corn, because it costs about a dollar more to produce a bushel of corn than the corn is worth. And you can't eat debt. However, in our country, the government pays farmers to raise corn that the market doesn't want. These subsidies have created a vast surplus of corn, which is sold to feedlots and force-fed to obese couch-potato cows.

It takes about 16 pounds of corn and soy to make just onepound of grain-fed beef. Multiply that by the thousands of tons of grain fed beef produced annually in this country. Under normal supply and demand, corn-fed beef wouldn't exist: it's only possible (by which we mean "profitable") because of about 5 billion dollars a year in government subsidies.

Simply stated, the government uses your tax dollars to pay off farmers and cattle growers who produce inferior food that in fact poisons you. Think about that on April 15.
Is the first sentence true? Even if it is true, it doesn't follow that no corn would be raised, as farmers would find cheaper ways to produce corn in the absence of subsidization. Of course, I'm not defending corn, not to mention that IMO subsidization of corn is both immoral and illegal (there is no constitutional authority for the federal government to create a Dept. of Agriculture).

At any rate, let's assume that it is true that it takes a dollar more to produce a bushel of corn than the corn is worth. Given the fact that in the absence of subsidization farmers could find ways to make corn production profitable (they just currently don't because they don't need to), there is no telling what the ratio of grass-fed to corn-fed beef would be on the free market. So, the claim that corn-fed beef would not exist on a free market is dubious. Of course it's possible that farmers COULDN'T find ways to make corn profitable, it's certainly the case that subsidization makes things possible would of never come about on the market, but again, one cannot be sure either way.
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 10:18 AM   #2
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Winkler View Post
Today t-nation posted an article about grass-fed beef, and during the intro, the author had this to say:



Is the first sentence true? Even if it is true, it doesn't follow that no corn would be raised, as farmers would find cheaper ways to produce corn in the absence of subsidization. Of course, I'm not defending corn, not to mention that IMO subsidization of corn is both immoral and illegal (there is no constitutional authority for the federal government to create a Dept. of Agriculture).

At any rate, let's assume that it is true that it takes a dollar more to produce a bushel of corn than the corn is worth. Given the fact that in the absence of subsidization farmers could find ways to make corn production profitable (they just currently don't because they don't need to), there is no telling what the ratio of grass-fed to corn-fed beef would be on the free market. So, the claim that corn-fed beef would not exist on a free market is dubious. Of course it's possible that farmers COULDN'T find ways to make corn profitable, it's certainly the case that subsidization makes things possible would of never come about on the market, but again, one cannot be sure either way.

Not sure where they pulled the specific numbers but I have seen the analysis in a number of places that basically feed corn is a losing venture (not the corn you eat at thegrocery store, that's a different strain) and the combination of subsidies and tax rebates are how most feed corn producers make money.

PBS had a great litttle documentary a couple weeks ago on two guys leasing and planitign an acre of corn and folwlign the product through the produciton chain...their take away point was that it's a loser. Worth look is you can find it.

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/kingcorn/

I think the Dept of Ag is brought to you by the commerce clause.. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3

A lot of differing opinions on whether it's been stretched too far, wetland regs, air and water qualtiy on the one hand, ATF, Dept.s of Ag etc on the other.
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:08 AM   #3
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default

I would argue that if the Dept. of Agri. comes out of the commerce clause then anything having to do with economic policy comes out of the commerce clause, i.e. the constitution grants full fleged facism or socialism or some combination thereof. Perhaps we need a department of computers to ensure the quality of computers, or a department of cell phones (USDCP).

Here's the mission statement of the USDCP:

Quote:
USDCP has created a strategic plan to implement its vision. The framework of this plan depends on these key activities: expanding markets for cell phone products and support international economic development, further developing alternative markets for cell phone products and activities, providing financing needed to help expand job opportunities and improve housing, utilities and infrastructure in Silicon Valley, enhancing cell phone safety by taking steps to reduce the prevalence of radiowave hazards from the manufacturing line to your ear, improving reception and options by providing assistance and education and promotion, and managing and protecting America's public and private cell phone towers working cooperatively with other levels of government and the private sector.
Hahahahaha, I made that from the USDA mission statement. *sigh* Give me a break it's a crappy rainy day....
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:14 AM   #4
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

Dude...I'm just saying..

Reasonable minds can differ on the interpretation of the various Articles. You can always get in the big game and further a different point of view but you've got a fair amount of case history to push back on. Might need to go to law school.
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 12:09 PM   #5
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default

Oh no, I'm not trying to jump on you or anything, please don't take it that way. Reasonable people always disagree. I think too often people get in the habit of thinking that if someone disagree's with them then they have some sort of "bad" agenda, or are stupid, or whatever. Not true, and in fact it may be youself that has the agenda and you don't realize it all the while believing you are the rational thinking, altrustic truth seeker. Confirmation bias baby! My agenda may be that as a libertarian I want the Constitution to allow as little government as possible, thinking that's what the founders intended (they weren't of equal intention, see Hamilton for example), and that documents should always be interpreted with the authors intention in mind (I'm not a postmodernist). Perhaps that's all or some of that is false.

One point of possible contention that we could discuss is the implication "might need to go to law school." Being an idealist, I would like to believe the Constitution was written so that the every man could understand, otherwise, how can he be sure what his rights are? If the Constitution is too difficult to decipher such that only an expert schooled in it's esoteric ways can understand (like the tax code) than this an imminent danger to liberty because you can never be sure of what your rights are and the government could tell you anything it want ("yes these are your rights, I'm sorry but you really have to go to law school or spend 500 hours going through case documents to understand why"). See what I'm saying? Perhaps I'm wrong though!

Anyways, I'm having too much fun making new government departments, so here's another: The U.S. Dpeartment of Physical Fitness! After all, personal trainers recieve money for their services so this falls under the commerce clause.

Quote:
With overwieght, obesity, and nutritional diseases such as heart disease and cancer at all time record highs, the USDPP has been created to further the efforts of the USDA to create unique nutrition and exercise opportunities for the benefit of the nations health.

USDCP has created a strategic plan to implement its vision. The framework of this plan depends on these key activities: expanding markets for personal training services, further developing alternative markets for fitness products and activities, providing financing needed to help expand job opportunities and improve gym facilities, utilities and infrastructure across the U.S., enhancing exercise safety by taking steps to reduce the prevalence of injuries from dangerous free weight lifting, improving adherence and enjoyment by providing assistance and education and promotion, and managing and protecting America's public and private gyms working cooperatively with other levels of government and the private sector.
You may want to know a little more about the USDPP. The USDPP will do it's best to sucessfully pass legislation that will prohibit any personal trainers from making claims about the health benefits of their exercise programs unless they meet USDPP exercise guidelines. Only machine based training, focusing on 8-12 exercises (1 for each major muscle group) and monostrucural cardiovascular training shall meet these guidelines. Don't worry, we're from the goverment and we're here to help you, which is exactly why we will do our best to enforce regulations that prohibit the use of kettlebells or C2 rowers(after all, we needed to protect you poor defenseless souls from raw milk and cooking oils with saturated fat).

Furthermore, any exercise program that meets USDPP guidelines has the option of recieving the USDPP healthy stamp of approval for a nominal fee of $4,000 (secret: sorry, only machine based exercise programs can recieve this stamp of approval because the Nautilus lobbyists had nice airplanes with pretty stewardesses, whereas Robb Wolf could only offer me a ride in his Ford Pinto with a picture of Natalie Portman in the glove box).

Finally, anyone participating in dangerous exericse programs such as Crossfit must pay an additional sin tax.

Thank You,

Neal Winkler (Secretary of USDPP).

{Note: I'm just having fun! }
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:20 PM   #6
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

you seem to have a passion for these ideas. you consider volunteering for a campaign or a libertarian non-profit? many are understaffed.
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:47 PM   #7
Garrett Smith
Senior Member
 
Garrett Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,368
Default

Passion is Neal's middle name...
__________________
Garrett Smith NMD CSCS BS, aka "Dr. G"
RepairRecoverRestore.com - Blood, Saliva, and Stool Testing
My radio show - The Path to Strength and Health
Garrett Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 03:06 PM   #8
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal Winkler View Post
whereas Robb Wolf could only offer me a ride in his Ford Pinto with a picture of Natalie Portman in the glove box
I'm holding out for Jessica Biel......I mean....seriously.....I just love her wonderful personality...and she aint too shabby to look at either...

What's a thread with the words "T-nation" without pics of half naked beautiful women.
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life

Last edited by Mike ODonnell : 05-08-2008 at 03:08 PM.
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 06:41 PM   #9
Allen Yeh
Senior Member
 
Allen Yeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett Smith View Post
Passion is Neal's middle name...
Is there such thing as a second first name?
__________________
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
Allen Yeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2008, 03:47 PM   #10
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default

Dave, I was a delegate for Ron Paul to the RNC but was not elected.
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator