Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Nutrition > General Nutrition

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2008, 11:55 AM   #1
Matt Lawson
Member
 
Matt Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default Getting Started

I decided that, after a week of 6 and 8 hour fasts, i would go double digits on hours. So far i have fasted 18 hours mon, tue, and wed (today). My schedule is kinda banged up so ive actually broken the fast just before working out on both days, today will be the exception.

Tuesday i chopped wood for 4 hours prior to breaking the fast and working out. I felt fine during the yard work but was tired for the weight training. I think it has a lot more to do with the yard work than with the fast.

I love it though, i feel clean, clear, and ready if that makes any sense.

In an attempt to stave off any potential metabolic slowing and possibly even add a few pounds of lean mass (im 158 in gym cloths) i have been eating 3k kcals in the 6 hour window. This is much harder than i thought it would be. I'm forced to eat lots of meat (i don't mind that part). ive dispensed with the pretense of using any sort of dressing for my greens and just smother stuff with Olive Oil. Beyond that i get a fair amount of cals from Milk. I know the paleo people are cringing but i do not eat any sort of grain, corn, or sugar at all.

My average day is somewhat hard, washing cars, yard work, training people ect. ect. I tend to train 3-5 days a week. Evenings i get to bed before 10 and get around 8 hours.


I was wondering if 3 days of this type of fast, followed by a day off, then a full day of fasting, then a "regular" weekend would be too much. (monday eat from 1-6, tues 1-6, wed 1-6, thurs normal eating, fri fast all day, sat and sun eat all day.

what do you guys think? Too Much? Should i adjust my Kcals?
Matt Lawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 01:25 PM   #2
Jay Cohen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Western Pa
Posts: 416
Default

Try it for a month or two, but it sounds sane to me. IF'ing has no hard and fast rules, other then NOT EATING for a certain time frame, then EATING for a certain time frame, repeat.

Chow On.
Jay Cohen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 01:50 PM   #3
Garrett Smith
Senior Member
 
Garrett Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,368
Default

Don't say "fast all day", that could mean anywhere from 24 to 35 hours, depending on your interpretation. Say how many hours you're going to fast for.
__________________
Garrett Smith NMD CSCS BS, aka "Dr. G"
RepairRecoverRestore.com - Blood, Saliva, and Stool Testing
My radio show - The Path to Strength and Health
Garrett Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 02:27 PM   #4
Matt Lawson
Member
 
Matt Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Good call Dr. G. When i mean fast all day i was thinking begin the fast at the end of the evening thursday, resume eating saturday morning.
Matt Lawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 02:46 PM   #5
Garrett Smith
Senior Member
 
Garrett Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,368
Default

Try it, but I'll warn you that you probably won't like it and may find it too catabolic.
__________________
Garrett Smith NMD CSCS BS, aka "Dr. G"
RepairRecoverRestore.com - Blood, Saliva, and Stool Testing
My radio show - The Path to Strength and Health
Garrett Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 03:39 PM   #6
Matt Lawson
Member
 
Matt Lawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 71
Default

Is IF inherently catabolic or is it just 36 hour fasts?
Matt Lawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 04:22 PM   #7
Garrett Smith
Senior Member
 
Garrett Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,368
Default

IF isn't inherently catabolic. I believe Dr. Eades has posted on the 30+ hour fasts, as well as some others on the CF board in the past.

The general consensus on the 30+ hour fasts done one or more times a week is that they are catabolic and less productive than multiple <24 hour ones. Depletion of amino acids necessary for the liver to detox products released by fasting could be part of the issue.

All I know is that keeping the fasts less than 24 hours has worked well, I believe many on this board would agree.
__________________
Garrett Smith NMD CSCS BS, aka "Dr. G"
RepairRecoverRestore.com - Blood, Saliva, and Stool Testing
My radio show - The Path to Strength and Health
Garrett Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 05:17 PM   #8
Derek Weaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642
Default

I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. G.

I fast rather haphazardly, though I find myself skipping breakfast on a much more regular basis these days.

I typically keep my fasts anywhere from 17-24 hours these last few weeks or so, with a 30+ hour fast a couple of times when I had an upset stomach.

I'd say his window looks pretty good, though on Friday I'd maybe break the fast for dinner and then have the two free days as scheduled. 3k calories in a 6 hour window should be plenty to add some weight.
__________________
Quote:
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
- CJ Kim
Derek Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 05:30 PM   #9
Garrett Smith
Senior Member
 
Garrett Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,368
Default

Trying to gain weight on IF sounds like a no-fun proposition to me--I just can't imagine the stuffed feeling I would have...
__________________
Garrett Smith NMD CSCS BS, aka "Dr. G"
RepairRecoverRestore.com - Blood, Saliva, and Stool Testing
My radio show - The Path to Strength and Health
Garrett Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 09:02 PM   #10
Derek Weaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642
Default

I actually think it's a little easier. Although, I did come from a background where overfeeding was not only the norm but whole heartedly encouraged.

I remember a post a while back where someone was saying that they were putting weight on without trying to... possibly due to better/enhanced digestion... I'll see if I can dig it up.
__________________
Quote:
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
- CJ Kim
Derek Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator