Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2008, 09:40 AM   #1
Pat McElhone
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
Default EPOC and the Neuroendocrine Response

In Steven Low's article states " EPOC (excessive post-exercise energy consumption) has generally been the explaining for the phenomena superior fat loss for HIIT versus ET. This theory is incorrect". I read the pubmed abstracts of the study this was based on (Laforgia, et al. 2006) and the related studies in Pubmed and have the following questions/points of view/thoughts.

1. How was EPOC measured? The abstracts did not say. How does on measure oxygen (O2) consumption? O2 Uptake can be measured easily, was this measured? If one only looks to when O2 uptake returns to normal, this does not correlate to when O2 consumption returns to normal. O2 uptake and O2 delivery (DO2) are generally 3-10x in excess of O2 needs (MVO2). So, you can have O2 uptake return to normal, but still have elevated O2 consumption.

2. How was "EPOC comprises only 6-15% of the net O2 cost of exercise" determined? Again, did they look at how much O2 was uptaken during exercise and after how long until O2 uptake returned to normal?

3. The neuoroendocrine response to exercise results in both an increase in Beta oxidation and glycolysis. The purpose of both of these is energy production (ATP). Beta oxidation gives us the substrates NADH, FADH2, and Acetyl Co-A. Beta Oxidation requires O2 (O2 consumption). Next, glycolysis also gives us a small amount of ATP, but also substrate (pyruvate), which ulitmately leads to NADH and FADH2. NADH and FADH2 require O2 (more O2 consumption) to give us ATP (energy). Is this O2 consumption considered as part of EPOC?

I just do not see how someone can measure O2 consumption or really how O2 consumption (not uptake) can be separated from the oxidative phosphorylation. Finally, when the term EPOC was "coined" does anyone know how it was used? Was it meant to refer not just to O2 consumption, but beta-oxidation, glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation?

All points of view are welcomed. It is nice to find an environment where my main interests....exercise and physiology/pharmacology interact. Now if anyone wants to start a thread on Alpha-2 receptors, I am in !
Pat McElhone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 09:44 AM   #2
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat McElhone View Post
Now if anyone wants to start a thread on Alpha-2 receptors, I am in !
That would be a good one!....although we need to bring back the ECA stack first.
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 09:59 AM   #3
Pat McElhone
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike ODonnell View Post
That would be a good one!....although we need to bring back the ECA stack first.
New here, what is the ECA stack?
Pat McElhone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 10:28 AM   #4
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

You know..I find the whole ephedrine caffeine aspirin (ECA stack) combo to be more believable and demonstrable than either EPOC or "neuroendrocrine response"....talk about black boxes

In fact... I think conceptually they're both slightly less useful than other training myths like the gallon of milk a day and the 20 rep squat, which deliver results nearly every time but are based on some pretty crude assumptions.
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 10:34 AM   #5
Steven Low
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
Default

I would *assume* the studies were smart enough to measure both O2 and CO2 as well as other methods. I think myoglobin storage of O2 is one of the reasons for the variable calculations as well as other estimates. For example, if you're interested in different methods take a look at this study on 400m/800m "anaerobic" vs "aerobic" contribution:

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/conten...00002/art00010

I do not know which one that used specifically though so I'm more or less dependent on the veracity of the researchers methods as much as you (unless you're willing to purchase the study o_o).

As for #3 I am sure they took that into account if not solely on the fact that the researchers did not even know about that. With global measurements, distinguishing O2 consumption is pretty much impossible which it should be as all O2 consumption (for ATP) should be considered EPOC.

Most of the oxygen consumed, ultimately would be for increased production of ATP from the result of oxidative phosphoylation from adipose tissue stores. That's because of the abundance of NADH that it produces so ironically or not even though interval training is traditionally assumed as "anaerobic" EPOC or any type of O2 consumption is measured mostly through aerobic contribution.

Sorry I don't have much more view into it than you do although I would check out the different methods of analysis in the paper I listed above to see if they hold up. Odds are they used one of them because if they used a new method of measurement they would've probably noted it in the abstract (and described it as well so it would show up in databases better and their article would get more hits/references).
__________________
Posts NOT intended as professional medical, training or nutrition advice.
Site // Bodyweight Strength Training Article // Overcoming Gravity Bodyweight Book

Last edited by Steven Low; 07-10-2008 at 10:37 AM.
Steven Low is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 12:21 PM   #6
Pat McElhone
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 180
Default

I am not ready to make the same assumptions. In fact, I assume O2 consumption was measured by looking at O2 uptake (ViO2, as termed in the linked article), versus O2 exhaled (VeO2), ViO2:VeO2 and when these values returned to baseline. Measuring tissue oxygenation is hard and expensive.

The linked article measures 4 things, with only lactate and ViO2 being quantitative data. One could argue that looking at lactate production can give insight into aerobic verses anaerobic ATP production, but with a total N of 16 and 11, how much is a natural variance? When I analyze a study and I see the term "calculated", I think "estimated".

I am surprised there is not a "Journal Club" topic on this board. People could post an interesting study and we could all tear it apart frequently or on a rare occasion, say "wow, a study that might actually prove a new thing that is actually applicable!"

Steven, thank you for the post, links, articles, your enthusiasm is nice to see.
Pat McElhone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 03:37 PM   #7
Steven Low
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
Default

Yeah, that's the problem with pretty much 99% of the studies coming out in exercise science/physiology... they have control/experimental groups of <15 people. Very small sample size doesn't lead to a great bit of accuracy in the data.

Yeah, sorry I can't offer anymore. Besides the Laforgia study you might be able to find a full text within the first couple links on EPOC I provided. I believe there was at least one.
__________________
Posts NOT intended as professional medical, training or nutrition advice.
Site // Bodyweight Strength Training Article // Overcoming Gravity Bodyweight Book
Steven Low is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator