Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2008, 09:24 AM   #11
Arien Malec
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Fury View Post
Interesting. Got a reference on that?
Uh, bad phrasing. I meant: fit and fat may not be an oxymoron, if the overweight is in the form of subcutaneous fat.
Arien Malec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2008, 09:41 AM   #12
Will Moore
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 42
Default

You are so correct....those who are naturally ectomorphic like yourself (me too) can only get so big without being fat. When I went to boot camp (Marines) in 1981, I weighed 142 pounds. Over the course of 15 years and a lot of weight lifting, I worked my way to to 175 pound (5% bodyfat). Since that time, I have been stronger than that and a bit heavier than that on many occasions....but I have never been able to get larger than 175 at 5% bodyfat. I was born to be skinny and my skeleton and genetics will not allow me to gain more muscle beyond that. Its a reality one has to deal with.
Will Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2008, 10:02 AM   #13
Blair Lowe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 594
Default

Wil, so all attempts at mass gaining failed or did you attempt without really knowing how. Way back once upon a time, I had an idea to get big but wasn't really putting in the food intake to support the lifting.
Blair Lowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.