Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Nutrition > Paleo Diet

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2009, 02:08 PM   #1
Spencer Durland
New Member
 
Spencer Durland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default A Problem of Public Policy

It seems to me that there is a policy concern that surfaces when one acknowledges the superiority of a paleo-type diet, or any diet that is higher in meat-based protein that the average diet. If it is presumed that a paleo diet is more healthful than others (and I believe this to be the case), there arises an interaction between the policy goals of promoting health and ensuring sustainability.

A 2003 study of the issue found that "The meat-based food system requires more energy, land, and water resources than the lactoovovegetarian diet.

Here is a link to the full text: http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/full/78/3/660S w/f/s

Pretend, for now, that the superiority of paleo-type nutrition in conferring health benefits is universally accepted. We would then be in the position of either endorsing that which is best for the individual and worst (or at least not best) for the group - in this case the world (or a county, continent, region, etc.), or in asking people to accept a diminished potential for health in order that the group see greater benefit.

I should note that the above referenced study finds that both "meat-based" and lacto diets prove unsustainable in the long run, but either way, I think that there are some serious choices of ethics to be made.

Sorry for the long post. I'd love to hear what other people think.
Spencer Durland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 02:40 PM   #2
Arien Malec
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
Default

From a perspective of environmental sustainability, both modern industrial agriculture (massive monoculture plantings) and modern meat production (massive CAFOs) are unmitigated disasters. It's such a disaster from that perspective that arguing about which is worse is absurd.

Sustainable meat production is literally solar powered meat. See http://www.polyfacefarms.com or http://www.marinsunfarms.com/index.html
Arien Malec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 02:54 PM   #3
Spencer Durland
New Member
 
Spencer Durland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default

I don't think that it's useless to consider the differences in sustainability between the two. To my mind it is likely that, whatever measures are taken to increase sustainability will not affect the inherent difference between a high-meat and lacto diet, in terms of sustainability. Thus, in relative terms, we are still confronted with the issue of "higher cost to the environment but higher benefit to individuals" vs. "higher cost to individuals but lower cost to the environment"
Spencer Durland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 03:13 PM   #4
Arien Malec
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
Default

If the switch is from eating more industrial grains to eating more industrial meat, you might be able to make a case (this can be argued either way). If the switch is from eating industrial grains to eating solar powered meat (and vegetables), the environmental and health benefits are both net positive.
Arien Malec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 04:20 PM   #5
Spencer Durland
New Member
 
Spencer Durland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Of course a net positive is a good thing. But so long as there is a difference between that which is best for a given person and that which is best for the planet on which we rely, there will be an ethical question. In other words, so long as "solar-lacto" is worse for a person but better for the environment and "solar-meat" is better for a person and worse for the environment, the question will remain.

It seems reasonably clear that a doctor's responsibility would be to recommend only that which most promotes the health of his/her patient. Similarly, an environmental scientist would be bound to recommend that course which offers the best possibility for long-term environmental health. The predicament falls on those who are concerned about both.

I am not arguing for any one answer to that question. I just thought of it recently and was interested in what other people thought.
Spencer Durland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 09:11 AM   #6
Mike Romano
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 39
Default

but....solar-lacto isn't better for the environment than a normal solar farm....a solar powered farming system makes use of animals to keep the land fertile, and it is perfectly sustainable/environmentally friendly. In fact, one cannot make a solar powered farm without animals. Honestly, I think that the real problem is that, as a race, we humans have surpassed our carrying capacity. CAFO's are not sustainable whatsoever: they consume land, they don't use it. It is a population problem, and regardless of lacto-ovo or whatever dietary approach we take, land will run out if CAFO's are not abandoned.
Mike Romano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 02:45 PM   #7
Spencer Durland
New Member
 
Spencer Durland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Romano View Post
Honestly, I think that the real problem is that, as a race, we humans have surpassed our carrying capacity.
I agree with this completely.

I am not at all familiar with solar farms, but what I hear you saying is that a solar farm provides equal amounts of lacto and meat products, without difference in effect on the environment. If this is the case, my question is, can the production from these solar farms equal demand? In other words, does a switch to solar farms necessarily require a diminished food output?

If the production will be less, then would we not be increasing the effect of "overloading" the environment, in this case on people, rather than the environment?

The negative effect on people I am envisioning is rising food prices and a disparate impact on those least able to afford basic necessities.

Last edited by Spencer Durland : 09-26-2009 at 02:47 PM. Reason: I wasn't clear
Spencer Durland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:58 AM   #8
Mike Romano
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 39
Default

per acre of land, more usable, edible biomass is produced than in an agricultural farm. However, grass farms cannot be as large because they require more maintenance per acre. No idea about the cost of the food, but I will say that the only reason agricultural products are so cheap now is because of government subsidies. Paradoxically, it is these subsidies that are putting farmers under.
Mike Romano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 01:22 PM   #9
Spencer Durland
New Member
 
Spencer Durland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Hmm...well thanks for the input guys. I'll have to look more into these solar farms and subsidies and whatnot.
Spencer Durland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 12:31 PM   #10
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
 
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,596
Default

Scott Kustes did some good posts on the sustainability of a Paleo diet:

http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009...estyle-series/

http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009...at-production/

http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009...ts-vegetables/
__________________
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator