
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
|
03-22-2010, 06:34 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Callahan
Well that is what I thought as well, but learned otherwise in the video.
When asked about his training Spealer says, "...so, lots of crossfit, and then throw in some strength work with it, which is still crossfit."
So apparently periodized strength work is still crossfit. Which then begs the question, what is not crossfit?
|
Everything is CrossFit. Went for a jog today? CF. Tossed a baseball? CF. Heck, CF even invented the pushup.
Spealler is still cool in my book though.
|
|
|
03-22-2010, 06:41 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642
|
I'm at the tail end of recovering from pneumonia for time. Right now I'm the World Record Holder. Still no posting on this page yet.
__________________
Quote:
|
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
|
- CJ Kim
|
|
|
03-22-2010, 07:04 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 555
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Skowron
Everything is CrossFit. Went for a jog today? CF. Tossed a baseball? CF. Heck, CF even invented the pushup.
Spealler is still cool in my book though.
|
For what it's worth, Spealler talked about his strength work (except for the back squat), as "constantly varied" and assuming he's doing it at a "high intensity" using "functional movements" that's basically the definition of CrossFit right there.
|
|
|
03-22-2010, 08:29 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,369
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Júlíus G. Magnússon
For what it's worth, Spealler talked about his strength work (except for the back squat), as "constantly varied" and assuming he's doing it at a "high intensity" using "functional movements" that's basically the definition of CrossFit right there.
|
So, by the all-inclusive definition of CF, then 5/3/1 is CF.
Functional movements, check.
High intensity, check.
Constantly varied? Well, since it is unlikely any final AMRAP set will be exactly like any other set (different reps), and the weights increase each week (different weight), every workout will be "different" than the one before it. Check.
CF's definition of fitness is about as useful as the Weider Principles.
I'll let you tell Wendler that 5/3/1 is CF. While you're at it, you should probably tell Louie Simmons he's doing CF too.
|
|
|
03-22-2010, 08:38 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,369
|
Actually, I've decided to combine a couple of Weider Principles to make a new, revolutionary exercise program.
Quote:
ECLECTIC TRAINING - Incorporate a diverse selection of variables, such as set, rep and exercise schemes, into your workout.
MUSCLE CONFUSION - Constantly change variables in your workout--number of sets, number of reps, exercise choice, order of exercises, length of your rest periods--to avoid getting in a rut and slowing growth.
PROGRESSIVE OVERLOAD - To continue making gains, your muscles need to work harder in a progressive manner from one workout to the next. During most of your training cycle, try to increase your weights each session, do more reps or sets, or decrease your rest periods between sets.
|
I think if I combined these with John Jesse's "Wrestling Physical Training Encyclopedia", I'd really be onto something.
|
|
|
03-22-2010, 11:25 PM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Júlíus G. Magnússon
For what it's worth, Spealler talked about his strength work (except for the back squat), as "constantly varied" and assuming he's doing it at a "high intensity" using "functional movements" that's basically the definition of CrossFit right there.
|
Well the Back Squats are not constantly varied as you point out, but he does say he tends to do the Olympic lifts to 80-90% max at least once a week, as well as a heavy metcon at least once a week. So even if he varies a little, it is not random.
I think Spealer is an amazing athlete, the way he throws around 155 in the video is damn impressive for a guy weight 140 or so. I just found it funny that when he talked about his training he would start saying how he tailors it to work around his weaknesses (ie not random) then would kinda look around all startled like and say, "but it is still crossfit". Just seemed forced, but that is my opinion. I think he trains smart and a lot of people, myself included could learn from it, but I also think the level of specialization he does gets away from what crossfit is.
Constantly varied functional movments preformed at high intensity.
That is Crossfit. But if you are tailoring workouts to address your weaknesses they are no longer constantly varied, nor are they necessarily always being preformed at high intensity. Therefore it is not crossfit. So if training for crossfit is no longer best suited by doing crossfit then where does that leave us? What am i missing?
__________________
"I swear by my life and by my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine"
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 02:04 AM
|
#17
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Callahan
Well the Back Squats are not constantly varied as you point out, but he does say he tends to do the Olympic lifts to 80-90% max at least once a week, as well as a heavy metcon at least once a week. So even if he varies a little, it is not random.
I think Spealer is an amazing athlete, the way he throws around 155 in the video is damn impressive for a guy weight 140 or so. I just found it funny that when he talked about his training he would start saying how he tailors it to work around his weaknesses (ie not random) then would kinda look around all startled like and say, "but it is still crossfit". Just seemed forced, but that is my opinion. I think he trains smart and a lot of people, myself included could learn from it, but I also think the level of specialization he does gets away from what crossfit is.
Constantly varied functional movments preformed at high intensity.
That is Crossfit. But if you are tailoring workouts to address your weaknesses they are no longer constantly varied, nor are they necessarily always being preformed at high intensity. Therefore it is not crossfit. So if training for crossfit is no longer best suited by doing crossfit then where does that leave us? What am i missing?
|
You are missing the part where it is much easier and marketable to program randomly. It also sounds sexy. It takes much more expertise to assess an athlete and program efficiently to his demands. It is also much more easier to have group classes if everyone is doing the same thing regardless of their needs. The results might be less than optimal, but you can sidestep that by making the prescription so lax that you can claim the results of people doing it the right way.
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 06:17 AM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 377
|
Regardless of people's opinions on CrossFit, Spealer is one hell of a fit and strong dude for his size. He blew away Khalipa's time and he got a time I wouldn't even get within 5 minutes of - at least... Both of them are very impressive.
There is only one CrossFit and that is .com, the rest are just their interpretations of it, some program effectively and some don't.
|
|
|
03-23-2010, 10:45 AM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 555
|
Maybe Spealler is just scared of being thrown out the window (like some other people) for not doing CrossFit.
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 01:29 PM
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,445
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Júlíus G. Magnússon
Maybe Spealler is just scared of being thrown out the window (like some other people) for not doing CrossFit.
|
People...kicked out...for disagreeing?! That's MADNESS.
If everything is CF, nothing is CF. You cannot have it both ways.
back to the book.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin
Robb's Blog
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:57 AM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|

|