Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2010, 11:39 PM   #1
John Thomas
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Default ---

John Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 12:12 AM   #2
Derek Weaver
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642

Originally Posted by John Thomas View Post
Does this look good -- too much volume? some glaring hole in the program? etc.
This is the hole in the program

Originally Posted by John Thomas View Post
I am trying to put together a strength training program that incorporates some of the crossfit benchmark workouts as "finishers."
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
- CJ Kim
Derek Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 06:47 AM   #3
Júlíus G. Magnússon
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 555

I wouldn't want to do ME lower body the day after Grace. If you removed the Grace on Thursday it sounds pretty good. Though Fran every week for six week sounds like six weeks of suck (especially on the same day as ME squats, lunges and SGDL).
Júlíus G. Magnússon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 06:54 AM   #4
Allen Yeh
Senior Member
Allen Yeh's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,245

The link didn't work for me.

I googled this:

He gives a Strength variation and a Strength and speed variation as well as a washed up meathead one. If you used the 2nd variation there is a day on Saturday for GPP so that day you could pick your finisher from the named workouts if you wished. Otherwise I'd recommend sticking with what Defranco has recommended.

It seems pretty crazy that people are already adding things to programs or changing them in a manner that it doesn't look like the program anymore when you are done. Give the WS4SB an honest run through as he has laid out first for a few months and then go to your variation if you needed. by the end of a few months.
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
Allen Yeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 08:23 AM   #5
Geoffrey Thompson
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 227

You really think you want to do Fran every week? The answer is that you don't want to do Fran every week.

I like the original template's ideas for conditioning. Sled pushing, some sprinting, that kind of stuff. If you really want to do CrossFit(TM) stuff, pick something more sane than 3 benchmark workouts per week, unless you really dial down the intensity, and you should probably do different ones each week.
Geoffrey Thompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 08:42 AM   #6
Gant Grimes
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,373

Originally Posted by John Thomas View Post
The point to all this is to eventually hit the following goals:

Deadlift: 500lbs
Squat: 400lbs
Bench Press: 300lbs
Shoulder Press: 200lbs
Vertical Jump: 30in
Broad Jump: 10’0”
Double-unders: 90 (no miss)
400m: 1:10min
Pull-ups: 20 (dead hang)
Dips 30
Push-ups: 100
Sit-ups: 110
Fran: 5min 3min
Grace: 5min 3min
Annie: 10min 7min
Kelly: 22min 18min
(I included two number on the crossfit stuff because, unlike the others, I really have no idea what's plausible)
Do you want to do all the crap you mentioned above, or do you want to hit these numbers? If the numbers are the important thing, than CF isn't the best way to get there (even for the CF benchmarks).

All of these are attainable except (possibly) the jumps. Unless you can already jump a good bit of that, a smattering of strength and GPP work won't get you there.

Edit: Is that your real name?
"It should be more like birthday party than physics class." | Log | 70's Big

Last edited by Gant Grimes; 10-11-2010 at 08:49 AM.
Gant Grimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 10:30 AM   #7
James Evans
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 594


I reckon you should give it a try for a month and let us know how it goes.

In fact, if it's a success you should drop Joe a line too.
The rationale for reduced gin intake and the knowledge of the perils of alcoholism and attendant metabolic derangement has almost entirely come from physicians and researchers.
James Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2010, 10:26 PM
John Thomas
This message has been deleted by John Thomas.
Old 10-12-2010, 01:51 AM
John Thomas
This message has been deleted by John Thomas.
Old 10-12-2010, 02:18 AM   #8
Derek Weaver
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,642

I'm not Gant, but I'll take a stab and contribute a little more than my original post.

I wouldn't think that the 30" vertical would be a huge problem. The 10 foot broad jump may be though. That's a healthy leap.

What I think most people have noticed is that the best way to get good at Crossfit is to not do Crossfit. Get strong first. Work speed, explosive power etc. Then, practice Crossfit.

When you look at the best Crossfit competitors, they often were actual athletes before joining the cult. Several played at a decent level. I think that Lipson guy played college baseball or something. Not sure.

Either way. There are very few CF'ers who are top notch who started as CF'ers and only do CF.

Josh Everett played DII or DIII football from what I remember.

I'd suggest you go with the Strength and Speed Template since it'll enable you to work some low level conditioning and.... speed. Select your exercises from the options intelligently. You could use the bench marks as indicators if you really wanted to. I wouldn't suggest it, but there are worse ideas.

Maybe run through the workouts over a couple weeks. Take a light week to work in the WS4SB program. Work intelligently for 3-4 months, deloading and rotating exercises accordingly, then retest.

If you're concerned with some of the CF stuff, a little technique work as part of your warm up wouldn't hurt.

The good thing is that if you're getting all "Westside" with a program, they built their original ideas on exercise variety. If you have exericse ADD like myself, a template like this may suit you very well. Tons of options to keep you entertained while you're improving.
And if you don't think kettleball squat cleans are difficult, I say, step up to the med-ball
- CJ Kim
Derek Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 05:57 AM
John Thomas
This message has been deleted by John Thomas.
Old 10-14-2010, 12:32 PM   #9
Rafe Kelley
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 148

I am not convinced that a 10 foot broad is particular more difficult then a 30 inch vert, a legit standing 30 inch vert is pretty rare, I have measured that high 4 times during real peaks of my fitness my best broad is 9^9 I know three other athletes who are at 10 feet who are 27 or under on the vert. Small sample and in the parkour community we do allot more standing broad jumps then standing verts as part of our training but the two feets seem similar in difficulty to me.
Rafe Kelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 01:10 PM   #10
Steven Low
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091

I think it depends a bit on your individual strengths in particular parts of the posterior/anterior chains.

I think it's the vertical leap that has a bit more quad action or something like that.... so if you're a bit more biased towards anterior chain + strong posterior you may be a bit better with the vertical.

For what it's worth my bests were 9'5" broad + 30" vert to give a few more numbers to the ones already stated in here.

It's a relatively good goals to aim for. You're going to have to work on technique for both though.

Also, your program is too high volume as stated before. Work towards your goals, but dont try to combine programs that almost never works. You generally have to compromise if you want to work towards all around ability though.
Posts NOT intended as professional medical, training or nutrition advice.
Site // Bodyweight Strength Training Article // Overcoming Gravity Bodyweight Book
Steven Low is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 05:55 PM
John Thomas
This message has been deleted by John Thomas.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
Products & Services
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator