
|
|
|
| BLOG |
ARTICLES |
WORKOUTS |
EXERCISES |
VIDEOS |
PHOTOS |
RESOURCES |
FORUM |
STORE |
CERTIFICATION |
AFFILIATES |
MAGAZINE |
SERVICES |
GYM |
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
|
02-01-2011, 10:09 AM
|
#1
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
|
Critique This Program Cycle
We've had very good results with this Wichita Falls influenced program in a traditional linear progression. Our goals are to build overall strength, build the strength in the slow lifts, and maintain and grow CF metcon ability. The gym population is generally beginner level with a few intermediate lifters.
* Monday – Squat (5x5) + shorter metcon
* Tuesday – Heavy Deadlift (5 rep max or 3-3-3) + shorter metcon
* Wednesday – Longer Metcon + skillwork
* Thursday – Squat (5x5) + Press (3-3-3-3-3)
* Friday – Power Cleans (3-3-3-3-3) + shorter metcon
Metcons are generally simple and designed to not interfere with recovery and the lifts. Thoughts/comments/concerns?
P.S. Please leave CF bashing to other threads.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 10:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 88
|
I'm personally not a fan of longer metcons the day before a big squat day (5x5 seems big to me); I've gone in the day after a long metcon to squat and usually have poor results. If that's not the case with you,then go for it. I seem to remember Justin L. saying something of a similar tone with regard for longer metcons before squat days.
I do like the two days off, but those five days in a row would be too much for me personally. If it has worked, then kudos to you. It does look heavily influenced by the Texas method, which is a great place to begin...
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 01:31 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
If by 5x5, do you mean sets across?
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 01:33 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,736
|
Take that same schedule and spread it across two weeks and you're getting somewhere.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 01:47 PM
|
#5
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
|
to clarify, longer metcons are 15 to 20 minutes and we like to incorporate 400-800M runs and 250 to 100m rows.
shorter metcons are 2 to 6 minute high intensity
a lot of clients take thursday off and makeup on Saturday, so typically they rest after the long stuff.
5x5 means 5-5-5-5-5 with the same weight, we have people work up in 5 to 10 pound increments each week and that typically stops working well after about 6 weeks.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 02:08 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,035
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Redinger
5x5 means 5-5-5-5-5 with the same weight, we have people work up in 5 to 10 pound increments each week and that typically stops working well after about 6 weeks.
|
There's a reason for that. 5x5 sets across gets brutal very quickly. You need to build in massive amounts of recovery time, and it will only work for certain populations (young people who are eating a ton). See Texas Method stuff (70s Big did a post on TM).
And what DvS said.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 03:19 PM
|
#7
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 10
|
...
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 03:27 PM
|
#8
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 9
|
Most people are working technique on the 5x5s, so while the recovery would be an issue for more experienced, not technically limited clients, the larger volume translates into better form and practice at the lift than truly exhausting sets.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 04:13 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Redinger
Most people are working technique on the 5x5s, so while the recovery would be an issue for more experienced, not technically limited clients, the larger volume translates into better form and practice at the lift than truly exhausting sets.
|
maybe folks would concur with what your planning if they knew what exactly are the the conditioning sessions you intend to use and how do they relate to the work that preceded them?
as it stands, for a raw group of novices, what you're proposing is pushing uphill needlessly.
|
|
|
02-01-2011, 05:47 PM
|
#10
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 10
|
Why no pressing?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 AM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|
|

|