Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Olympic Weightlifting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2011, 02:50 AM   #11
Pete Gordon
Member
 
Pete Gordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Brice View Post
Can you explain this a bit more? I always thought exploding early (and jumping forward) is something that should be avoided?
I"m not really sure what to say. The concept / practice that is promoted is allowing the bar to follow as much of a straight line as possible...while still allowing a 'hook' type of path. Jumping backwards makes the top part of the hook longer..meaning more distance is covered, jumping forward means the top part of the hook is...quite thin.
Pete Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 05:03 AM   #12
Gareth Rees
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 48
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete Gordon View Post
I"m not really sure what to say. The concept / practice that is promoted is allowing the bar to follow as much of a straight line as possible...while still allowing a 'hook' type of path. Jumping backwards makes the top part of the hook longer..meaning more distance is covered, jumping forward means the top part of the hook is...quite thin.
I'm not quite sure that I agree with this, Pete.
I'm no expert, but I'm of the opinion and understanding that manipulating your lift / pull so that it follows as straight line as possible is bad (that's the impression that you're giving me that you're trying to say, I apologise if this isn't correct or accurate). That's what basic mechanics say is best in terms of efficiency, which is fine if you're a machine with a single joint or plane of motion to move around, but we as humans are not a machine designed to lift maximal weights (as our body has not evolved simply for sport/weightlifting performance). The concept of the S pull is based upon the premise of achieving adequate muscle tension in the correct positions/at the correct times, while most importantly maintaining a correct combined centre of gravity (CCOG) of the barbell/body unit over the feet. Thus, jumping forward is a result of an issue somewhere in the pull (whatever it may be), causing the CCOG to be more forward than it should be, forcing you to jump forward to catch it.
Obviously some lifters lift better jumping forward, some backwards, and some none at all, all to various degrees... But again I am of the opinion that optimal pulls necessitate no jump forward or back, next to this a jump slightly backward is best (as some athletes employ a slightly S pull), and lastly is a jump forward.
Obviously this is my opinion, and others will have theirs, but just thought I'd share... I look forward to any response
__________________
Courage does not always roar. Sometimes courage is the quiet voice at the end of the day saying 'I will try again tomorrow' - Mary Anne Radmacher
Gareth Rees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 10:45 PM   #13
Bee Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 54
Default

I don't really believe in a straight-bar path. As far as I'm concerned, if your lifting technique is sufficient, bar path will be almost straight.

If you purposely shift your technique to make a "minor" thing appear "prettier" (such as keeping your toes directly under the barbell before your first pull at the expense of comfort, hyperextending your back to make yourself feel like a "Taner Sagir" during the third pull, or keeping the bar as close to your body as possible to where you practically bend your arms to "control" the weight), then your lift will only suffer.



Doing an olympic lift is simple:

-Drive with the legs at the beginning.

-Get into the pre-explosion position.

-Explode.

-Catch.



If you perfect those movements, you will perfect your olympic-lifting technique.
Bee Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2011, 05:13 AM   #14
Pete Gordon
Member
 
Pete Gordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth Rees View Post
The concept of the S pull is based upon the premise of achieving adequate muscle tension in the correct positions/at the correct times, while most importantly maintaining a correct combined centre of gravity (CCOG) of the barbell/body unit over the feet.

Thus, jumping forward is a result of an issue somewhere in the pull (whatever it may be), causing the CCOG to be more forward than it should be, forcing you to jump forward to catch it.

Obviously some lifters lift better jumping forward, some backwards, and some none at all, all to various degrees.I am of the opinion that optimal pulls necessitate no jump forward or back, next to this a jump slightly backward is best (as some athletes employ a slightly S pull), and lastly is a jump forward.
Obviously this is my opinion, and others will have theirs, but just thought I'd share... I look forward to any response
Thanks for such an insightful response. You have made some pretty good points. Perhaps I am thinking of the mechanics incorrectly. Perhaps the thinking of the method is to prevent any potential jumping back..making the 'hook' still like a traditional hook...but not as exaggerated. I hope you understand what I mean. I'm not drunk lol

The encouragement that is usually given is to push the hips through the bar. The result of this is moving perhaps only an inch forward from the initially pulling position.

There is ample evidence to support that jumping backwards is inefficient...due to the youtube is awash with highly decorated athletes doing this. One of my fav lifters - Dimitry Klockov frequently jumps backwards (though not much) when lifting. Is he succesful? Damn right.
Pete Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.