Go Back   Olympic Weightlifting Forums - Catalyst Athletics > Olympic Weightlifting > Other

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2007, 10:25 AM   #1
Greg Everett
Greg Everett's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,838
Default Rock Climbing - Measuring Progress

Looking for some ideas regarding measuring progress for a climber. Hard to guage the effectiveness (at least in the short term) of training as it transfers to climbing because of the nature of the sport - routes are graded, but the assignments are largely subjective and unavoidably biased by the grader's own strengths and weaknesses.

So aside from the obvious tests of gym variables that can be assumed to transfer, e.g. max pull-ups, weighted pull-up, grip stamina, flexibility, etc., anyone have ideas about how to measure progress for climbing?
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches - 3rd Edition Now Out

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 11:00 AM   #2
Rick Deckart
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 554

It's been over 20 years that I was in rock climbing, but fitness wise (I know you didn't ask for this) I would look into:

a) max pullup set, how many reps
b) one repetition max pullup, do a pullup, add 10lbs, repeat until no longer possible
c)one arm lockoff, pull youself with the chin over the bar, let go with the other arm, Variable is time until chin drops under bar
d)one set max of frenchies, that is pullups with rest in three positions (top, 90 degrees and 120 degree), each held for 6--7 seconds)
e) one set max of fingertip pullups on a 1.5cm wide edge
f) two arm lockoff on fingertips on same edge, Variable time till chin drops below edge
g) straight arm hang from a pullup bar for time.
h) situps number of reps
i) side split, distance to floor
j) high step distance to ground

I think that's the fitness test from expert climber Eric Hörst...

Not sure if this helps, but whatever
Rick Deckart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 12:43 PM   #3
Mike ODonnell
Senior Member
Mike ODonnell's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,560

I'd say if you make it to the top....you win....other than that....performance for a rock climber would be timed routes? How fast to get up a certain distance....then come back and check on it a few weeks later? Dunno...my fat Irish ass doesnt get far off the ground.
Fitness Spotlight
The IF Life
Mike ODonnell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 01:11 PM   #4
Robert Allison
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 238

Great question.

As someone who has climbed on and off for a few years, I tend to think that the only real way to measure progress in climbing is by climbing. This is not to suggest that weight lifting and other training methods (outside of time on rock) are not important, because they are. But depending on the type of climb attempted, the technical aspects of climbing can be as much of a limiting factor as strength, endurance, etc.

I am a great case in point. In terms of physically conditioning and strength, I am at a level equal to or greater than many of my climbing partners. But I am not nearly as good a climber as they are.

I don't know if that helps any. One of my friends is a guide and I will run this by him, to see if he has any feedback.
Robert Allison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 04:50 PM   #5
Andew Cattermole
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 40

In terms of training
These would be best served on indoor walls for repeatable performance testing.

Campus Moves
Double Hand
2 rungs up one rung down for time

Single Arm Timed Hangs of Campus Rungs

I would look towards bouldering problem repeats for set time on indoor walls.
Take a V grade that is within ability and rehearsed
Then repeat it for a set time period for max number of sucessfull repeats.Rest off Wall.

Dyno’s for Height
Pick two good jugs in level position with marginal footholds(reduce the size of the foot holds to smears, or position on a angle wall).
Dyno for height with a slap.

For a Set Time Period for Laps
Top Rope Up (Hard) Routes
Down climb (easy) back up (Hard)
Rest only "On Wall"
Andew Cattermole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 06:04 PM   #6
Jonas Lind
Jonas Lind's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 62

Having spent the last 10 years bouldering I do think you can get some help measuring progress by looking at grades. With experience you can always ballpark a problem by looking at it or feeling out the moves. It's not an exact science, it can never be, so you need to use a broad spectrum of problems.

Campusing is good but I think a really good way would be to use a System Board. On it you do problems by doing the same type moves on the same type holds from bottom to top. That would definately work when used right.

I can go into it further if you find axcess to one... they are not hard to build.
Jonas Lind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 08:00 PM   #7
Kevin Scott Kett
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 10

Years ago I injured my shoulder climbing on Mount Yonah GA.

We used prussic climbs to measure my recovery progress.
Kevin Scott Kett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 01:38 PM   #8
David Aguasca
David Aguasca's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 124

I'd say it's pretty tricky.

campusing strength is definitely only a small part of a climbing. i think it would be akin to testing somebody's clean and jerk by just testing their max clean pull. sure, you'll know how strong they are, but technique is a big (huge?) part of it all, isn't it?

the only way i can think of measuring progress in actual climbing skill (not campusing strength or grip strength/endurance) would be to attempt routes/problems outside. i say outside because unlike in a gym, routes and problems are usually (and IMHO should be) reset often. also, i think the psychological component in climbing is important, and climbing in a gym can often feel too safe, as well as not having the same amount of exposure as can be attained outside.

i think WHAT kind of climbing performance you are looking for is important. are you looking to test performance in a climbing comp, where athleticism is paramount, and all variables are controlled? what about the ability to climb in cold weather, snow, or maybe the opposite, on a baking hot wall with only 2 liters of water a day for 3-4 days straight?

i don't know if that helped or hurt, but that's my take on it.
David Aguasca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 05:02 PM   #9
Jesse Woody
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 127
Default One thing...

Unless I missed it, I don't think anybody mentioned what kind of climbing he's involved in. There will be a totally separate set of demands required between bouldering and long adventure climbing. What's his specialty, or is he an all-around climber of sorts?

Haha, never mind, David mentioned that right above me I'd say figure out his aims, then some of the standards that Andrew set would be great. If he's like me, and wants to be a world class boulderer along with a standard-setting crack-climber, he'll probably have some problems...some people are never happy
Jesse Woody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 05:38 PM   #10
Andew Cattermole
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 40

Totally agree that the clients focus/goals (V10 or Astroman??)
and what type of climbing is important.
And ofcause real progress is seen in improving onsight,redpoint or flash ability outdoors.
But I took Greg's question to mean repeatable tests for a short cycle of training.
Since most climbers (who Train specifically for climbing) train at indoor gyms. then indoor would give them verifiable(same holds/same problem /same routes) repeatable tests to compare after a short cycle of training.

I didn't mention it but for beginners
Hang Board Drills
Sloppers, Chins for set time
Pinch Locks Offs for time etc

And the system board is good stuff as mentioned by Jonas,but if not available a reheresed boulder problem/s would mirror the same principle.

I would be interested in what you put together and the results if happy to share.
Andew Cattermole is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.