|
8 Comments
|
|
Craig C. @ The Compound
|
1 | 2010-09-20
|
Snatch - 79% x 1 x 3 @ 190# (even though I only hit 185# on Sat.)
Clean & jerk - 74% x 1 x 3 @ 240#
Snatch pull on 2" riser - 90% x 3 x 3 @ 225#
Front squat - 84% x 2 x 4 @ 310#
Slow moving today, but felt more recovered. |
|
|
marcus
|
2 | 2010-09-20
|
Snatch 125x1x3
Clean and Jerk 135x1x3
Snatch pull on riser 145x3x3
Front Squat 190x2x4
Stuff felt pretty good today. Still not dropping low enough on the jerk. |
|
|
Brad C. @ The Compound
|
3 | 2010-09-20
|
Snatch: 190 x 1x3
Clean & Jerk: 245 x 1x3
Snatch Pull on 2" Riser: 225 x 3x3
Front Squat: 310 x 2x4 |
|
|
CW
|
4 | 2010-09-20
|
Snatch - 79% x 1 x 3
93lb x 1 x 3
Clean & jerk - 74% x 1 x 3
113lb x 1 x 3
Snatch pull on 2" riser - 90% (of snatch) x 3 x 3
103lb x 3 x 3 - first time using a riser - very different.
Front squat - 84% x 2 x 4
135lb x 2 x 4. Heavy. |
|
|
Gene
|
5 | 2010-09-20
|
Snatch - 79% 61kg x 1 x 3
Clean & jerk - 74% 75kg x 1 x 3
Snatch pull on 2" riser - 90% 70kg(of snatch) x 3 x 3
Front squat - 84% 205# x 2 x 4
Snatches were going terrible until I realized I had 10 kg more on bar than I had intended. Kilos is a whole new language!
Snatch pulls from risers felt way more powerful! I was able to pull to my Adams apple... |
|
|
Mikkel Højlund
|
6 | 2010-09-21
|
Snatch 51kg x 1 x 3
Clean & Jerk 62kg x 1 x 3
Snatch pull on riser 60kg x 3 x 3
Front squat 101kg x 2 x 4
Greg: Was it deliberate that the boxjumps were missing? - I can see that squat-volume seems to decrease towards the end of the cycle. |
|
|
grady mac
|
7 | 2010-09-21
|
http://www.members.shaw.ca/weights2/KIM-Kwang-Hoon.jpg
Same Loading sequence! |
|
|
Greg Everett
|
8 | 2010-09-21
|
Mikkel -
Yes, no box jumps today.
Grady -
Nice catch, Rainman. |
|
Leave a Comment
|
