Catalyst Athletics Forums

Catalyst Athletics Forums (http://www.catalystathletics.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Nutrition (http://www.catalystathletics.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Daily Mail IF article. (http://www.catalystathletics.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4845)

Darryl Shaw 11-24-2009 05:22 AM

Daily Mail IF article.
 
Quote:

Feast or famine: The diet that won't just help you lose weight, you'll live longer and be brainier!

As all dieters will know, there is nothing more tedious than counting calories or weighing foods for a meal plan. Especially if you then don't lose weight. But there's now an effective weight-loss regimen that is not only simple, it promises significant health benefits - from easing asthma symptoms and reducing blood sugar levels, to fending off heart disease and breast cancer and protecting brain cells. Apparently, you'll also live longer.

The diet goes under various names - The Alternate-Day Diet, Intermittent Fasting or The Longevity Diet - but the principle is the same: eat very little one day (50 per cent of your normal intake) and as much as you like the next. This appears to trigger a 'skinny' gene that encourages the body to burn fat.

Researchers first discovered the benefits of low-calorie eating in the Thirties. They found that putting a rat - or a worm, or a fruit fly or just about any animal, as it turned out - on a permanent very low calorie diet helped the animal live about 30 per cent longer than normal. The animal had clearer arteries, lower levels of inflammation, better blood sugar control and its brain cells were less likely to get damaged. Meanwhile, rates of diseases linked to ageing all dropped. But while scientists have known for years that animals on a low-calorie diet were healthier, no human - except a few iron-willed fanatics - could permanently stick to this regime.

The big breakthrough came in 2003 when Dr Mark Mattson, an American neuroscientist, discovered rats still enjoyed all those health benefits even when their calories were cut only on alternate days.

In other words, you don't have to starve yourself all the time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...-brainier.html

Mike ODonnell 11-24-2009 10:08 AM

Makes a good point on IF days "should" be lower in calories than non IF days if weight loss is the goal (I stick to those being low carb, higher protein myself)

Great stuff! Thanks for sharing.

James Evans 11-27-2009 02:57 AM

Remarkably open minded for such a shithouse newspaper.

Michael Barnes 02-23-2010 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Evans (Post 65807)
Remarkably open minded for such a shithouse newspaper.

.. in its defence....the mail does have great sports writers...




okbye

James Evans 02-25-2010 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Barnes (Post 71430)
.. in its defence....the mail does have great sports writers...




okbye

Really?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.