View Single Post
Old 03-26-2009, 03:50 PM   #14
Robert Callahan
Member
 
Robert Callahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 94
Default

Most of his complaints were about soviet bloc stuff and didn't really concern me much. The only comment made that I found interesting was this one:

Quote:
“Bigger muscles also mean more efficient leverage around important joints. Knees, elbows, hips and shoulders work better when the muscles that operate them are larger… big quads work better than small quads….”

Not True.

Equating muscle mass and mechanical efficiency is simply not true.
I understand he then talks about how many sports strength is only useful in its application to power so getting big and bulky doesn't necessarily help. But in regards to just pure strength I don't understand how the increased mechanical efficiency argument is not true? Is he just making a BS argument about how size is not always better when that is not what Rip is saying? or is there more to it that I am not seeing?
__________________
"I swear by my life and by my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine"
Robert Callahan is offline   Reply With Quote