View Single Post
Old 10-02-2009, 06:05 AM   #14
Darryl Shaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Romano View Post
I don't really think that it is an understatement to say that meat eating made us human...chimps don't consume all that much meat: only 10% of chimp feces contain remnants of other animals.
True, and that's an important consideration when looking at which foods kick started our evolution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Romano
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20045146/T...sue-Hypothesis

Explains how are meat consumption gave us room to allow our brains to grow, by allowing our digestive tracts to shrink. This is the prevailing, accepted theory among anthropologists, at least the ones I know.
I'm familiar with the expensive tissue hypothesis and it does seem to be the most likely explanation for how we developed our large brains. The question though is which foods made it all possible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Romano
Also, bonobos don't eat meat really....mostly frugivorous. They are the "lovers", while chimps are the "fighters". Their point of divergence was assumed to be mate choice actually....some females preferred less violent males, and others preferred more violent males. The more violent ones=chimps, and vice versa.
Bonobos do hunt and they do eat meat - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1013124416.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Romano
Don't really understand how that study goes to prove anything along the lines of a shortened digestive tract though. It says that the divergence was maybe 200,000 years ago, when Homo sapiens evolved much earlier. Also, it says that there was directional pressure only in areas where people were fed high starch diets, and it became somewhat common by drift elsewhere, even where high-starch diets were not consumed. So, the study itself admits that many societies did not eat high-starch diets at this time...maybe I'm misinterpreting the study, but that's what I got out of it.
Okay perhaps that wasn't the best study to use so maybe this does a better job of explaining things - http://press.ucsc.edu/text.asp?pid=1553.

Anyway, I think there are two possible scenarios to consider -

Option A: Six million years ago a group of chimps became highly efficient hunters and significantly increased the amount of meat they were eating thereby increasing the quality and calorie density of their diets leading to the whole small gut big brain evolution thing.

or

Option B: Six million years ago a random gene mutation eventually lead to one group of chimps being able to better digest the starchy roots and tubers they were routinely eating thereby increasing the quality and calorie density of their diets leading to the whole small gut big brain evolution thing.

So which seems like the more probable scenario?
Darryl Shaw is offline   Reply With Quote