Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2007, 02:41 PM   #1
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default What is proper form?

How does one determine what constitutes proper form for an exercise?

I imagine it's something like biomechanical efficiency and minimizing insult to tissues, but I'm wondering if when two people disagree about form, are they just disagreeing with those two things (or some other addition whatever it may be) or are do they disagree about the fundamental priniciple of what it means to be proper?
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 04:32 PM   #2
Chris Forbis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 836
Default

This sounds like a question one would hear in philosophy class.

Here's my amateur response. It is here to be ripped to shreds by those following.

1. Accomplishing the defined ROM of the lift in as efficient manner as possible.
2. Doing so with minimal risk of injury.
Chris Forbis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 04:46 PM   #3
Neal Winkler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
This sounds like a question one would hear in philosophy class.
Hey, you can't have a forum for exercise technique without knowing what it means for technique to be proper, can you? Plus I don't think this question will be as difficult to solve as other philosophy questions.

Now that I think about it more, I think we need to add 3) Work the desired muscle groups according to 4) the intended force/velocity relationship.

I'm glad you added "defined range of motion" into your definition, because I was expecting someone to say that the exercise has to go through a full range of motion. That obviously can't be right because there reasons for dong partials.
Neal Winkler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 07:42 AM   #4
Allen Yeh
Senior Member
 
Allen Yeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 4,245
Default

Neal, for some reason or another I found myself thinking about this question over the weekend here's a few thoughts to further muddy the waters.

1. Proper form in what context? For general health? Bodybuilding? Powerlifting? Olympic weightlifting? For sport?

While almost every one of those have some similiarities, doing something slightly different will be more beneficial for people focused on each. In bodybuilding especially partial reps will elicit more hypertrophy than doing "proper form" would. That's better for the bodybuilder because that's his goal and what he needs contest day.

What I said above though doesn't make sense because if you were observing someone working out, without any obvious cues how would you know what context a person is working out for as opposed to doing the movement wrong and harming themselves?

A good example I found recently is the kb/db swing.

1. Hard style - emphasis on hip snap
2. GS style - emphasis on energy conservation but completing the movement
3. "bodybuilding" style - emphasis less on both of the above but using momentum to do a very heavy front shoulder raise.

Out of the 3 it seems that the 3rd seems to be the one with the most possibility of being "bad" but the guy who advocated that style (Christian Thibedeau) isn't exactly an idiot either.
__________________
"And for crying out loud. Don't go into the pain cave. I can't stress this enough. Your Totem Animal won't be in there to help you. You'll be on your own. The Pain Cave is for cowards.
Pain is your companion, don't go hide from it."
-Kelly Starrett
Allen Yeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 09:01 AM   #5
Yael Grauer
Senior Member
 
Yael Grauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,590
Default

In addition to doing the movement wrong and hurting yourself, there's also the whole doing it wrong so it's quicker and easier thing. If you do say 500 Thai kicks it certainly is tempting. Or partial squats when you started out doing full squats--it probably won't hurt you too much to do 20 partial air squats at the end of a set, but it's still not the form you started with and set out to do...
__________________
http://yaelwrites.com
Yael Grauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 03:12 PM   #6
Robb Wolf
Senior Member
 
Robb Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,444
Default

I was not going to touch this one...seems like a perfect question for Barry Cooper....but he said he'd never post here, so considering the above smarty-pants contributions...I'd say the form the provides the greatest benefit based on ones intended goals.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin

Robb's Blog
Robb Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 09:06 AM   #7
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,726
Default

yeah everyone's pretty much said it in one way or another. "proper" is entirely contextual. So what form we want will be determined by the circumstances, including the athlete's abilities and limitations, the desired training effect, the equipment available, etc.

So to answer you final question, usually people disagree about form because they're 1) stupid, 2) ignorant of the circumstances, and/or 3) stupid.

The squat is a perfect example. There's a new Oly vs. Rip squat debate on the CF forum about every 3 minutes. But everyone involved is using the squat to achieve different things, so the arguments made tend to be entirely useless.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator