Go Back   Olympic Weightlifting Forums - Catalyst Athletics > Olympic Weightlifting > Other

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2008, 05:44 PM   #21
Gittit Shwartz
Senior Member
Gittit Shwartz's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 295

Coordination is a super interesting subject.

Thomas Kurz and Jozef Drabik describe 7 separate coordinative abilities:

1. Balance
2. Movement adequacy
3. Kinesthetic differentiation
4. Reactivity to cues
5. Sense of rhythm (every movement has an inherent optimal rhythm even if it is not related to music - think of a few technique you've learned and you'll see what I mean.)
6. Spatial orientation
7. Synchronization of movements

(I don't have the book with me at the moment, or I'd give their explanations of each item - "Children and Sports Training" by Drabik, highly recommended.)

Gymnastics covers all the abilities but #4 (reactivity). Ball games are strong on reactivity and several of the other abilities, weaker on others. Dance may be fun but also not strong all around.

I work with kids (3-8 year olds) with the lofty goal of "developing coordination and athletic ability". I've wracked my brains many times to construct a program that covers every item on the list, and always come to the same conclusion - Capoeira with some extra gymnastics thrown in is ideal for "coordination". Strong on every one of the points.
Good Capoeiristas quickly pick up and become good at any sport. That should speak for itself.

I agree, great suggestions on this thread!
Radio G
Gittit Shwartz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 08:59 PM   #22
Peter Dell'Orto
Peter Dell'Orto's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 122

Originally Posted by Brandon Oto View Post
Now Dave, don't you think picking up girls is about as functional as it gets?
It takes two to tango. And tango is fun to learn.

"Pull your hips closer together. Closer. Now, hold her tight and step."


I figure if I can master tango and finally get my handstand down, I'm practically Gomez Addams.
Peter V. Dell'Orto
My workout log
Peter Dell'Orto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 04:56 AM   #23
Robert Pierce
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

Gaelic football.

The real version is outdoors, but our group plays an indoor version. It is simple to learn. Accuracy, balance, and most, if not all of the aspects of coordination mentioned above.
Robert Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 04:49 PM   #24
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,708

Originally Posted by Brandon Oto View Post
Now Dave, don't you think picking up girls is about as functional as it gets?

I've never needed to train for that, dude.

further more...it's unlikely I'll ever have to pick up a woman other than my wife. As a gentleman I would never divulge her weight but it wouldn't rise to the level of challenging even if there were two of her...and I don't think she's into that...
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 04:34 AM   #25
Noel Welsh
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4

I've done a fair bit of breaking (aka breakdancing), ballroom dance, and gymnastics, and a bit of rock-climbing. My opinions are as follows:

Gymnastics will develop all around athleticism, coordination, and flexibility. There are well defined progressions to develop your skills. Coaches are usually qualified and experienced. Training facilities are usually very nice (foam cell floors are great) with lots of toys. A strong focus on form is good for getting skills fundamentally sound, but I find the emphasis on trivial details (like pointing toes) annoying.

Breaking will get you pretty much what floor gymnastics does; it is basically applied tumbling. The coaching is usually less qualified, and the floors (sprung wood in most dance studios) hurt more when you crash. Form is not so emphasised. However you get a lot more freedom to create your own moves and follow your own path, and there are aspects, liking reacting to the music, that gymnastics doesn't have.

Ballroom dancing, at least to the level I do it, is fun but nowhere near as demanding as breaking or gymnastics.

While rock-climbing can make good use of existing flexibility I don't see that it develops flexibility. Balance will certainly improve, as will finger strength. It is quite expensive, at least around here, which is the main reason I don't do it more often. I don't think it's as balanced, in terms of all over body development, as breaking or gymnastics.

If I had to pick one purely from the standpoint of athletic development I'd choose gymnastics, because of the coaching and range of ways it gives you to assault your body (rings, floor, pommel horse, etc.) However I always recommend doing what you find fun, and there are enough gymnastic sports (add at least freerunning and capoeira to the above) that there is something for everyone.
Noel Welsh is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.