Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Olympic Weightlifting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2009, 01:27 AM   #11
Enrique Billington
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 60
Default

And it would be a rare sight to see Charniga rave about the books he sells. His team/company (Dynamic Fitness) is the US distributor of Eleiko and Adidas weightlifting products and that's all I've ever seen him "rave" about, if you would call it that.
Enrique Billington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 09:00 AM   #12
Reed Winn
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Richmond
Posts: 177
Default

He has some relatively minor problems with PP but, by comparison with some of the other reviews, he implicitly sings its praises. It's not like PP is above reproach or something. He is pretty harsh on Strongman though.

Brian Lawyer:
Rippetoe has released a DVD now. Have you much need of more complex training at this point in your training career? If you are doing a "SS like" program PP probably will not be that useful(yet) but I've found it invaluable both for direct use of the intermediate concepts in my training as well as getting a better picture of the overall theory of long term training.
Reed Winn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 01:00 PM   #13
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

lolzzzzzz

I went back and read a couple articles...That guy is hilariuous...Some of the most jaundiced bitter ravings I've seen in a while....reminds me of:

Boxing coaches bitching about MMA,

Roadies bitching about mountain bikers and

Jazz artistS bitching about hip hop....

Change happens. It's brutal, I know.
.................................................. ....

EDIT:

revisting this with an eye to not being disrespectful of Mr. C's, ..I do think a lot of the writing is intended to provoke a response rather than being just off the wall....
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 04:50 PM   #14
Robert Callahan
Member
 
Robert Callahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 94
Default

Most of his complaints were about soviet bloc stuff and didn't really concern me much. The only comment made that I found interesting was this one:

Quote:
“Bigger muscles also mean more efficient leverage around important joints. Knees, elbows, hips and shoulders work better when the muscles that operate them are larger… big quads work better than small quads….”

Not True.

Equating muscle mass and mechanical efficiency is simply not true.
I understand he then talks about how many sports strength is only useful in its application to power so getting big and bulky doesn't necessarily help. But in regards to just pure strength I don't understand how the increased mechanical efficiency argument is not true? Is he just making a BS argument about how size is not always better when that is not what Rip is saying? or is there more to it that I am not seeing?
__________________
"I swear by my life and by my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine"
Robert Callahan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2009, 01:51 PM   #15
Victor Cruzeiro
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Callahan View Post
Most of his complaints were about soviet bloc stuff and didn't really concern me much. The only comment made that I found interesting was this one:



I understand he then talks about how many sports strength is only useful in its application to power so getting big and bulky doesn't necessarily help. But in regards to just pure strength I don't understand how the increased mechanical efficiency argument is not true? Is he just making a BS argument about how size is not always better when that is not what Rip is saying? or is there more to it that I am not seeing?
That was my one issue with the article as well.
Basicaly Rip says, "Bigger muscles have better leverage and can move more weight."
And Charniga replies, "Bigger muscles aren't necessarily better from a power production standpoint. Excess mass can be a detriment."
As you pointed out Robert, these are two different arguments.

Other than that, he disagrees with Rip's view on Russian literature which he is certainly more than qualified to do.
He doesn't say anything negative about Rip's theory or programming. Doesn't mention it at all really.

V
Victor Cruzeiro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.