
|
|
|
| BLOG |
ARTICLES |
WORKOUTS |
EXERCISES |
VIDEOS |
PHOTOS |
RESOURCES |
FORUM |
STORE |
CERTIFICATION |
AFFILIATES |
MAGAZINE |
SERVICES |
GYM |
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
|
03-26-2010, 08:03 PM
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Low
Do you have rings?
If you want to be serious about bodyweight training there's always manna.
Handstand variations of course...
And as always iron cross. I usually suggest people first get both back lever and front lever before starting cross, and do some sufficient elbow preparation work. Coach Sommer's bulgarian dips are good as well as taking planche and strap assisted handstand/HSPU to the rings.
|
I do have rings, but they're such a hassle to setup. Some day when I will use them again consistently, I will probably purchase the new Elite Rings.
The manna sounds interesting. How does the difficulty compare to the Back Lever, Planche, and Iron Cross? I'll have to decide between Handstand work or manna work.
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 02:07 AM
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 589
|
My/Our WU consists of 3 sets of seated pike and straddle leg lifts. Lately it's been 5 lifts with a 5s hold at the end. Another variation was lifts in 5-3-2 with holds of 3s and we used to also employ 10 lifts with a 3 or 5 hold as well or 3s lifts with longer holds.
Every 3-4 days? For my guys, they do it at the end of every workout which means MWF. I do it at the end of every workout, but only work straddle-L. Generally I do 6x10s. Lately, I've been doing it in an undergrip on the edge of a beam because it's similar to rings though it does flex my wrists hard (I probably should just do it on rings).
For the guys, they need to master both the L-sit and straddle-L sit because it's in the routines (there is the L-hang and L-sit in L4 besides the press from straddle-L to L-sit in L4). In later levels, there is the endo roll press HS besides the need for L strength for the HB kip.
However, it's just done as finish 60s of the hold, mainly cause it's the end of the workout and they vary in how tired they are from day to day and because it's been quite a long time since we've tested hold times (since we have been in pre-season/season now for 6mo). As well, I've noticed these boys tend to suck with ever doing 50% of max time holds and rarely ever want to hold anything more than 3-5s.
I used to try to work V-hangs and straddle-L holds for time and that would just crush my hip flexors. Now, I just incorporate the V&L-hangs in HLL. 3s in V, 3s in L.
3 of my guys probably have the flexibility for manna one day but do not have the strength yet as they are far off from optionals. I'm thinking it would be a good goal to get them a manna by the time they are in optionals.
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 01:38 PM
|
#23
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donald Lee
I do have rings, but they're such a hassle to setup. Some day when I will use them again consistently, I will probably purchase the new Elite Rings.
The manna sounds interesting. How does the difficulty compare to the Back Lever, Planche, and Iron Cross? I'll have to decide between Handstand work or manna work.
|
Do both manna and handstand work... I suggest they be coupled.
Manna is a C level skill by the way... cross is a B, and maltese is a D so it is inbetween there.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 10:08 AM
|
#24
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 248
|
Great article.
1)If the front lever is weaker than the back-lever, would it be acceptable to just train it as the first pulling movement?
2) Although I did not see any mention of straight body work in this article what is your opinion on the straight body movements/progressions in a program. Would you consider them more along the lines of "accessory work"? If not, what is the role of straight body work in training? Sorry if this does not make sense.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 12:09 PM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Kerr
Great article.
1)If the front lever is weaker than the back-lever, would it be acceptable to just train it as the first pulling movement?
|
this actually sparks a question i've had for a while. the front lever is a ton harder than the back lever, and the victorian is a ton harder than a maltese. why is this? at first thought, it would seem the opposite since you can use your lats on the extensions. i always think of the lats as these massive slabs of muscle. yet these motions are incredibly harder. is the lat not able to engage as well as the anterior muscles when in a horizontal position?
i've been working crosses for not that long, and a part of me thinks that my crosses may surpass my front levers at the rate i'm going.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 01:13 PM
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grissim Connery
this actually sparks a question i've had for a while. the front lever is a ton harder than the back lever, and the victorian is a ton harder than a maltese. why is this? at first thought, it would seem the opposite since you can use your lats on the extensions. i always think of the lats as these massive slabs of muscle. yet these motions are incredibly harder. is the lat not able to engage as well as the anterior muscles when in a horizontal position?
i've been working crosses for not that long, and a part of me thinks that my crosses may surpass my front levers at the rate i'm going.
|
My guess is that for the victorian, your rear delts are going to be the weak link, since those have to be held at a kind of mid extension for the entirety of a victorian.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 02:47 PM
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 646
|
It probably has to do with how our bodies are built. Certain muscles and movements are naturally stronger. For example, you can do much more weight on the pec deck for your chest than the opposite for the back muscles. I'm sure the fact that the body's not very comfortable in a German hang position also makes the back lever easier.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 06:01 PM
|
#28
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,091
|
Back lever is much stronger than front lever because of a couple reasons:
~Lats are in a much more mechanically efficient position/angle of pulling. Since they insert on the thoracolumbar fascia on the back, with your arms in front for the front lever they have to basically wrap around your body and are not getting full force production out of them. In the back, the mechanical angle is much more efficient.
~We are stronger in flexion in general than extension. Even though the arms are behind the body, the scapula & humerus and all of the muscles that insert/originate from it are much more efficient (just like the example above) in performing movements that are generally in front of our body.
~lower back, glutes, legs contract harder and thus get more full body tension from back lever than in front lever with the abs.
~Often pulling work is limited by weakness in the external rotators, posterior delts, scapular retractors, etc. A lot of stalled front lever progress can be mitigated if you focus on those specific areas to bring them up to par.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 07:49 PM
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 299
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Low
~We are stronger in flexion in general than extension.
|
Err, what?
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 08:05 PM
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon Oto
Err, what?
|
Front shoulder raises = flexion
Bring your shoulder down = extension
He's talking about when your arms are in front of or behind your body.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:02 PM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|
|

|