
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.
|
|
|
 |
06-25-2011, 05:22 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 692
|
The Effects of Intermittent or Continuous Energy Restriction on Weight Loss.
Quote:
The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: a randomised trial in young overweight women.
Abstract
Background
The problems of adherence to energy restriction in humans are well known.
Objective
To compare the feasibility and effectiveness of IER with CER for weight loss, insulin sensitivity and other metabolic disease risk markers.
Design
Randomised comparison of a 25% energy restriction as IER (~2266 kJ/day for 2 days/week) or CER (~6276 kJ/day for 7 days/week) in 107 overweight or obese (mean [±SD] body mass index 30.6 [±5.1] kg/m2) premenopausal women over 6 months. Weight, anthropometry, biomarkers for breast cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and dementia risk; insulin resistance (HOMA), oxidative stress markers, leptin, adiponectin, IGF-1 and IGF binding proteins 1 and 2, androgens, prolactin, inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein and sialic acid), lipids, blood pressure and brain derived neurotrophic factor were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months.
Results
Last observation carried forward analysis showed IER and CER are equally effective for weight loss, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) weight change for IER was −6.4 (−7.9 to −4.8) kg vs.−5.6 (−6.9 to −4.4) kg for CER (P value for difference between groups = 0.4). Both groups experienced comparable reductions in leptin, free androgen index, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure and increases in sex hormone binding globulin, IGF binding proteins 1 and 2. Reductions in fasting insulin and insulin resistance were modest in both groups, but greater with IER than CER; difference between groups for fasting insulin −1.2 [−1.4 to −1.0] μU/ml, and insulin resistance −1.2 [−1.5 to −1.0] μU/mmol/L (both P=0.04).
Conclusion
IER is as effective as CER in regards to weight loss, insulin sensitivity and other health biomarkers and may be offered as an alternative equivalent to CER for weight loss and reducing disease risk.
|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...4/?tool=pubmed
|
|
|
06-27-2011, 02:47 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
|
So if you take overweight people and have them lose weight their health markers improved. Who would have thought...
|
|
|
06-28-2011, 12:28 AM
|
#3
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Riddle
So if you take overweight people and have them lose weight their health markers improved. Who would have thought...
|
Also, if you eat less you lose weight ... another shocker.
|
|
|
06-28-2011, 02:35 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willem Koster
Also, if you eat less you lose weight ... another shocker.
|
Wow, that study was a two-fer!
I'm in the wrong line of work...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 PM.
|
|
Submit your question to be answered by Greg or Aimee Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website
Submit Your Question
|
Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters. We are currently recruting new lifters and offer sponsorship opportunities.
Read More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All content © Catalyst Athletics, Inc. | 1257 Tasman Drive Suite A | Sunnyvale, CA 94089 | 408-400-0067 | Site Terms & Conditions
|
|
|

|