Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Training Logs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-23-2009, 11:09 PM   #1
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default My Strength Misadventures...

I've been doing 5/3/1 for the past month or so and like it so far, so I figured I'd post a log here so others can see what I do and how well it works out...

I'm not terribly strong at the moment, stats are:
Height: 6'
Starting Weight: 170 (now about 175?)

Current Estimated Maxes:
SQ: 205
BP: 158
DL: 292
PR: 98

Current Cycle's Training Maxes:
SQ: 195
BP: 140
DL: 255
PR: 80

Goals:
Get as strong as possible with steady progress and gain weight.

Layout right now:
M: DL / PR
W: BP
F: SQ / (maybe some BP assist)

I record things in weight(lbs) x reps x sets, or weight x reps.

Anyway, I'll kick it off with yesterday's workout, currently in the second week of my second wave:

Monday (6/23/09):
DL: 135x5, 185x3, 205x3, 230x8 (Est Max: 292)
PR: 45x5, 55x3, 65x3, 75x9 (Est Max: 98)
Back Ext: 10x5
Chins: 3x6 (not good at these, just adding sets..)
Incline DB: 20x15x4
Pulldown Abs: Whatever x5

The DL was a pretty big rep and a smaller est max PR. Press was a pretty big rep PR with 75 lbs, and a 2 lb est max PR.
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 11:43 AM   #2
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Wednesday (6/25/09):
BP: 45x5, 100x3, 110x3, 125x6 (Est Max: 150, 1 rep PR)
DB Rows: 35x10, 45x10, 55x12
Incline DB: 35x10x5

BP felt heavy.. a month ago I got quite a bit more reps with ten pounds less, oh well. It might be because of pressing on monday, maybe I will not push as hard on the press rep records, or switch BP and Press if it's too bad. We'll see.
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 03:24 PM   #3
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Got confused today and did the 5/3/1 squat workout instead of 3x3...

SQ: 45x5, 145x5, 165x3, 185x4 (Est Max: 210)
GM: 95x10x5
Abs: 5 sets

5 lb PR on the estimated max, not sure what I'll do next week, maybe the 3x3 and work up to a max single...
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 04:34 PM   #4
Derek Simonds
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Deland, FL
Posts: 4,231
Default

Gavin looking good on the 5/3/1. Thanks for posting your log.
__________________
What we think, or what we know, or what we believe, is in the end, of little consequence. The only thing of consequence is what we do. -John Ruskin

http://westvolusiawellness.com/
Derek Simonds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 02:43 PM   #5
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Thanks Derek. Just as a small update, I forgot my school's gym access card this week.. so I'm taking a forced week off, just random stuff, but nothing sturctured. Back at it next week!
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 02:18 PM   #6
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Decided my press sucks too much to make much difference, so I dropped it for incline presses instead. I'll be able to use more weight and feel like I'm actually doing a little bit of work on this day... So here's today:

Tuesday (7/7/09):
DL: 135x5, 195x5, 215x3, 245x4 (Est Max: 278)
Incline: 115x3 (Tested for what weight to use for cycle), 95x5x5 (For some volume)
Back Raises: 10x5
Chins: 5, 3x5
Abs: 5 Sets

Decided I was also tired of always being out of breath, so I'm going to add some conditioning work after DL and SQ days. My school has an ergonomic rower, which I found out earlier this year... first time trying it out:

Erg Rower: 5 minutes; 1006 Meters. Anyone know if slightly better than a 2:30 500M time is OK? First time trying them out, just did a moderate pace for 5 minutes as to not go overboard...

To reiterate my conditioning sucking, I can perform OK in things that kinda sorta require a bit of it (short distance running/sprinting, moving furniture, running up stairs, etc), it just takes me longer (a lot longer) to recover to normal breathing afterwards than it should...
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 03:56 PM   #7
Júlíus G. Magnússon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 555
Default

Is it a Concept 2 rower?
__________________
log
Júlíus G. Magnússon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 04:32 PM   #8
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Júlíus G. Magnússon View Post
Is it a Concept 2 rower?
Yes, not sure which model beyond that, though. I put it at about 3-4 on the dampening thing, since I remember that approximates water resistance well.
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 04:36 PM   #9
Júlíus G. Magnússon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iceland
Posts: 555
Default

For your height/weight I don't think you should be going over 2:00/500m on a 5 minute effort. It's probably just a technique issue. The CrossFit Journal has some solid articles on row technique if you have a subscription.
__________________
log
Júlíus G. Magnússon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 06:00 PM   #10
Gavin Harrison
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Júlíus G. Magnússon View Post
For your height/weight I don't think you should be going over 2:00/500m on a 5 minute effort. It's probably just a technique issue. The CrossFit Journal has some solid articles on row technique if you have a subscription.
This could be, but also like I said, it was only a moderate effort. Nothing real intense. No CFJ subscription.
Gavin Harrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.