Home   |   Contact   |   Help

Get Our Newsletter
Sign up for our free newsletter to get training tips and stay up to date on Catalyst Athletics, and get a FREE issue of the Performance Menu journal.

Go Back   Catalyst Athletics Forums > Training > Fitness, Strength & CrossFit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2007, 03:26 AM   #1
James Evans
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 594
Default Kettlebells for Olympic Weightlifting

This may be of interest:

http://e-strengthsolutions.blogspot....htlifting.html
James Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 04:53 AM   #2
Steve Shafley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,285
Default

I think Mike Burgener's and Dan John's use of the kbs is more appropriate for olympic lifters, kind of as a synegistic accessory for the classical lifts.

While the kb might give you a feel for the lift, it's still nothing like a barbell.

It's like deadlifting a kettlebell....yeah, it's a deadlift, but the real lift is done with a barbell.
Steve Shafley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 09:35 AM   #3
Dave Van Skike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Shafley View Post
I think Mike Burgener's and Dan John's use of the kbs is more appropriate for olympic lifters, kind of as a synegistic accessory for the classical lifts.

While the kb might give you a feel for the lift, it's still nothing like a barbell.

It's like deadlifting a kettlebell....yeah, it's a deadlift, but the real lift is done with a barbell.

IMHO, done "correctly" the KB and BB versions lof teh snatch and c&j ook nothing alike.
__________________
Practical Strength
Dave Van Skike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 01:29 PM   #4
Danny John
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 131
Default

I wouldn't use kbells to help O lift tech...I would use them to prep the athlete for the O lifts. Hell, I can go years w/o doing an O lift and still lift well on the platform.
Danny John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2007, 08:16 PM   #5
Pierre Auge
Senior Member
 
Pierre Auge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 529
Default

WARNING !HIJACK!

Danny,
I want your opinion on that statement you just made, relative this one:

Would that be true had you stopped lifting only a year or two after
you started. I think the answer would be no, but I'd like your thoughts.

My point is your statement is open ended, yes I agree a masters lifter after years of lifting could lay off and the neuro pathways that made you a good lifter years before are so well developed that you can call up those skills on command.

But for a very good young lifter who lays off for 20 years and comes back as a masters lifter though some of the basic kinesthetic awareness may be there, this athlete may still need some level of technical rehash. Like rebooting your computer. Clear the memory, clear the cache and load the program anew!

I may just be pondering over nothing, for I have nothing better to do!

Anyway I agree that kettlebells are not the answer to improving technical ability in the lifts. They are a great, simple tool for getting yourself into condition to lift as DJ said. But so is lifting! So whatever!!! The thing is they have a funny way of letting you work around inflexibility and injuries where dumbbells being more unstable and linear can sometimes complicate things.

I just say this about the difference:
The Kettlebell it to the long jump what the Bar is to the vertical! Neither the same but similar enough to confuse...
__________________
NOTICE: Pierre Auge's opinions are subject to change at any time and without prior notice.

To give real service you must add something which cannot be bought or measured with money, and that is sincerity and integrity. - Douglas Adams
Pierre Auge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 09:21 AM   #6
Danny John
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 131
Default

The track and field issue is similar, but different. Throwers throw...jumpers jump. The more I can get my high jumper David Cassel to jump, the better he does. I find that Highland Games help my discus throwers as much as going to another discus clinic.

The mental cache issue is quite right, I think...let me think about this...
Danny John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2007, 04:16 PM   #7
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,738
Default

kb's usefulness for the o lifts is restricted really to their ability to develop strength and power--not at all to the motor pattens since as steve, dave and danny point out, there is no kb movement that at all resembles a barbell o-lift in any genuine way. that said, their usefulness for strength and power development is not as great as other barbell accessory lifts, e.g. squats, DLs, pulls, etc. so if someone is using kbs as a primary way of developing their OLing, they either don't want to be the best lifter possible, or they're confused.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:34 AM   #8
Jason C. Brown
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 30
Default

How about DBs ? I love DBs as much as I do KBs. We have two full racks of DBs, 70 KBs and 2 barbells at CFP.

IMO, I see no reason to barbell O-lift other than to be good at barbell O-lifting. I think they're highly overrated and take too much time to learn. Let's not even talk about teh general population lacking wrist flexibility.

Greg,

Any reason why the girls from HQ pull outside their legs using DBs? The Snatch looks more like a curl and press. Doesn't Coach Rut pull differently ?
Jason C. Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 08:46 AM   #9
Greg Everett
Administrator
 
Greg Everett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,738
Default

I like DBs, and I think if done carefully, a DB o-lift more closely resembles the movement of a barbell O-lift, but still won't really improve the barbell O-lifts in any significant way since the loading will never exceed what's possible with a bar and the movement is just different enough to not transfer exactly.

I'd aagree that for GPP and health, the barbell O-lifts are neither necessary nor the best things out there. I'm speaking from the perspective of O-lifting as a sport or the specific development of the barbell lifts and how KBs/DBs play into that.

RE SC girls - You mean that in a 1-arm DB snatch they start with the DB outside the leg instead of between the legs? Those SC people do all kinds of goofy stuff. Seriously, I don't know. I don't approve of much of their movement interpretation (like gripping the DBs unevenly during a clean so they'll swing onto the shoulders more easily... WTF?) because too often it seems intended to simply make the movements easier and more rapid for metabolic training, but in too many cases, i think it's counterproductive certainly to developing good movement patterns and even sometimes to the metabolic conditioning they're aiming for.

Yes, Rut (and I and anyone I train) pulls a DB snatch from between the legs as we would with a KB.
__________________
Olympic Weightlifting: A Complete Guide for Athletes & Coaches

"Without a doubt the best book on the market about Olympic-style weightlifting." - Mike Burgener, USAW Senior International Coach

American Weightlifting: The Documentary
Catalyst Athletics
Performance Menu Journal
Greg Everett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 05:36 PM   #10
Robb Wolf
Senior Member
 
Robb Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,444
Default

[quote=Jason C. Brown;5942]
Greg,
Any reason why the girls from HQ pull outside their legs using DBs? The Snatch looks more like a curl and press. Doesn't Coach Rut pull differently ?[/quote.
I'm not Greg (though I play him on TV) and I love the girls at SC but the DB's by your legs, one end drooping down to the ground is RETARDED. It shifts what would have been some nice posterior chain stimulus to the quads. I hate that movement as much or more than trap bar DL's.

This reminds me vaguely of the "look at the ground while doing HSPU's to increase your ROM" that spills forth from CrossFit Santa Cruz. Put yourself in a completely fudged up orthopedic position to get 2 inches of travel when you could perform them in a sound manner elevated on some 25lb plates or Paralettes? Nein.
__________________
"Survival will be neither to the strongest of the species, nor to the most intelligent, but to those most adaptable to change."
C. Darwin

Robb's Blog
Robb Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Subscribe to our Newsletter


Receive emails with training tips, news updates, events info, sale notifications and more.
ASK GREG

Submit your question to be answered by Greg Everett in the Performance Menu or on the website

Submit Your Question
WEIGHTLIFTING TEAM

Catalyst Athletics is a USA Weightlifting team of competitive Olympic-style weightlifters with multiple national team medals.

Read More
Olympic Weightlifting Book
Catalyst Athletics
Contact Us
About
Help
Newsletter
Products & Services
Gym
Store
Seminars
Weightlifting Team
Performance Menu
Magazine Home
Subscriber Login
Issues
Articles
Workouts
About the Program
Workout Archives
Exercise Demos
Text Only
Instructional Content
Exercise Demos
Video Gallery
Free Articles
Free Recipes
Resources
Recommended Books & DVDs
Olympic Weightlifting Guide
Discussion Forum
Weight Conversion Calculator